Replies

If the fossils are the result of animals killed by the flood, and Noah didn't take any of the fish or other aquatic animals aboard the arc because they would survive the flood, then all of the fossils should be land animals. There should be no fossils of aquatic animals to speak of, since they wouldn't have been killed, and therefore wouldn't have left any fossils behind.

There was a 100% death rate for terrestrial life during the Flood. But so long as there was even a 0.01% (or whatever) survival rate among sea life, the sea life would not have needed to go on the ark. There would have been sufficient survivors to re-establish their populations after things settled down. As a practical matter I expect that the vast majority of aquatic life did die in the Kataklusmos. (To use the Greek NT term for this event.)

I notice the evolutionists here have once again failed to respond to the article in question.