[[And what evolutionary descent would that be, now that the evidence has forced the Evos to (finally) hack down Darwin’s “tree of life”, and all those phylogenetic trees are being thrown into dissaray by the finding that over 93% (and growing) of the genome is functional?]]
There is no ‘evidence’- they mistake ‘assumptions about continuance’ as ‘evidence’- their evidence-less a priori assumptions are deemed ‘science’ while opposition with evidence is labelled ‘psuedoscience’- just hte claim of ‘e find fossils in specific order of descent’ is enough- no evidence of continuance is needed- just the claim.
That definitely seems to be their m.o.