Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
if he thinks he sees dogs “every bit of four feet tall at his back.” Maybe ON someone’s back, not at its own.

Really? Never been around a full grown mastiff I take it....


65 posted on 03/17/2009 8:45:26 AM PDT by Snurple (VEGETARIAN, OLD INDIAN WORD FOR BAD HUNTER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Snurple

Matter of fact, I do know a few mastiffs up close. And I’ve never seen one...nor any other breed of dog...that’s 48” high at the back.
And I do not believe anyone else has either.


66 posted on 03/17/2009 8:54:24 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (American Revolution II -- overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Snurple; LongElegantLegs; numberonepal

http://www.spike.com/video/worlds-tallest-dog/2682371

Ok folks. I know it’s blarney day. But the article says bull mastiff, not mastiff, and it says four feet on his back.

At the link provided you can see the “world’s tallest dog” (tall standing up). He is shown standing on four legs near two people, and his back does NOT come up to their belts.

48” is about armpit level on most people. Think about it.

And if you know any dog that high, Guinness wants to hear from you.


69 posted on 03/17/2009 9:09:37 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (American Revolution II -- overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson