LOL. Nice try. the problem was GWB didnt sell the public on a humanitarian mission, he sold them on WMDs and “Mushroom Clouds” . But let's play your game. If Iraq was so critical to something, than why didnt GWB enact an Iraq tax? All you Neo-cons would have been glad to pay more taxes to save all those lives (or whatever). But No! Your moral outrage went more like “This war is critical, but I am not paying for it. I want a tax cut. Let someone elses kids pay for it. But I get to take moral credit for supporting it. A true Great American who cares!” . GWB didnt fund the Iraq war with an Iraq tax because he would have lost the election in 2004. Moral my a...
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!
I supported the war with Iraq as a high-school student in 2002 and 2003 on the grounds that Iraq's government was developing "weapons of mass destruction," or WMDs, in violation of U.N. resolutions to which the U.S. was a party.
Of course, after the aforementioned WMDs were not found (aside from a stock of yellowcake uranium), the Bush administration and the hawks changed their tune and said that we were in Iraq for humanitarian and "national security" purposes. [Any time a government official plays the "national security" card, chances are good that they just don't want to tell you the real reasons and that they think you'll believe their horse puckey.]
This is no game as far as I'm concerned.
I'm sincerely trying to help you overcome your obsession. But you need to want to. I can't help you unless you're willing to help yourself.
I extend the the same helping hand to any friends you have who share your affliction.
Not true. Pres. Bush laid down a line in the sand for Saddam Hussein which was to comply with the U.N. resolutions. He didn't comly and Bush did as promised.