Skip to comments.
Romney to fundraise for Jindal (?)
Pravda-AP ^
| 3-17-09
| staff
Posted on 03/16/2009 12:40:17 PM PDT by VinL
Edited on 03/16/2009 12:42:02 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) - Gov. Bobby Jindal is getting fundraising help from former presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who is expected to be a leading GOP presidential contender again in 2012.
Jindal plans to hold a campaign event on April 16 in Boston sponsored by Romney.
(Excerpt) Read more at wxvt.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: jindal; romenyjindal; romney; romneyromney; romneyromneyromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: libbylu
I do not care what mitt does. If I am drinking kool aid it is blended with 100% pure truthful Conservatism... no sugar added.
mitt said in 2007, “I was never part of the Reagan revolution”.
Well, if he was not part of the Reagan revolution, he was part of jimmuh catah’s socialist disaster. I will never back mitt nor will I give him any leeway at all. He is an example of the endemic rot of liberalism in the GOP.
LLS
41
posted on
03/16/2009 2:16:18 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
To: greyfoxx39
...adoring article... This AP article states that Romney is going to fundraise for Jindal. Please, point out the adoration, because I don't see it.
....posted over and over and over and over...
Was this article posted previously? Where's the link?
I'm assuming here that your comment has some factual content, but maybe not. Alternatively, your comments are not based on any reality, but are the emanations from Willardland, the magical world inhabited by FR Romney-loathers, in which the supreme truth is that Romney sucks, so any other truth hardly matters.
42
posted on
03/16/2009 2:39:18 PM PDT
by
Plutarch
To: Dr.Zoidberg
43
posted on
03/16/2009 2:45:50 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Stupidity has an expiration date 1-20-2013 *(Thanks Nana))
To: Allegra
Headed for Antique I hope...
44
posted on
03/16/2009 2:46:43 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Stupidity has an expiration date 1-20-2013 *(Thanks Nana))
To: greyfoxx39
Yuoers, especailly is that ones case...
I have the post on my other PC, may still have it..
45
posted on
03/16/2009 2:47:35 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(Stupidity has an expiration date 1-20-2013 *(Thanks Nana))
To: Plutarch
Are you incapable of using the search mechanism ? And feel free to correct anything we’ve said exposing Slick Willard as a total fraud. Unlike you sycophants, we actually base our conclusions on his record, not a bunch of worthless talk and even more worthless promises.
46
posted on
03/16/2009 3:24:02 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: Darwin Fish
Romney would not have won. His Hedge Fund past would have been the death knell for him after the bailouts. In fact, I don’t think any of the candidates could have won after Bush requested the bailouts and the Stock Market tanked.
To: Diogenesis
LOL, great picture and captioning.
48
posted on
03/16/2009 4:09:37 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Baloney. Jindal for all practical purposes can’t run in 2012 anyway. He has a state election in November 2011 just weeks before the primaries start. Look for Jindal to be the veep pick in 2012.
To: stockpirate; GOP_Lady
Mitt couldnt beat McCain for Gods sake. Rudy let McCain walk right through the front door. Additionally, had Charlie Crist endorsed Romney there is a good chance Romney would've been the nominee and maybe the President (right now).
To: Diogenesis
Half of that chart is cherry-picked half-truths, while the rest is just downright malicious.
To: fieldmarshaldj
Why can’t you just say Mitt Romney? It’s not hard...
To: Crimson Elephant
Maybe. The Bush-Paulson bailout panic was our undoing.
To: Norman Bates
Norman Bates (Professional RomneyBOT):
"Half of that chart is cherry-picked half-truths, while the rest is just downright malicious." Such disingenuity from the Romney Peanut Gallery.
Which half? What is half-truth?
Which is malicious? We DARE you to tell us.
Cherry picked? Do come off your knees before your Master,
and when you do arise, favor and enlighten us.
To: Norman Bates
Crist, the RINO! Well I guess one RINO will endorse another.
Problem is all three of them are RINO’s.
55
posted on
03/16/2009 5:02:39 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
(A people unwilling to use extreme violence to preserve liberty, deserves the tyrant that rules them.)
To: Norman Bates
Norman Bates (Professional RomneyBOT):
"Additionally, had Charlie Crist endorsed Romney
there is a good chance Romney would've been the nominee and maybe the President (right now). ". If wishes were horses, Romney could have put his horse on his car's rooftop
and abused his horse, like he abused his dog, Seamus.
"But the details of the event are more than unseemly they may, in fact, be illegal.
Massachusetts's animal cruelty laws specifically prohibit anyone
from carrying an animal "in or upon a vehicle, or otherwise, in an unnecessarily cruel
or inhuman manner or in a way and manner which might endanger the
animal carried thereon." An officer for the Massachusetts Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals responded to a description of the situation
saying "it's definitely something I'd want to check out." The officer,
Nadia Branca, declined to give a definitive opinion on whether Romney broke the law
but did note that it's against state law to have a dog in an open bed of a pick-up truck,
and "if the dog was being carried in a way that endangers it, that would be illegal."
"Dog on Roof? What Was It Like for Romney's Pooch?
Scientists Say Dog Likely Experienced Wind-Whipped, Uncomfortable Trip
"Before beginning the drive, Mitt Romney put Seamus, the family's hulking Irish setter,
in a dog carrier and attached it to the station wagon's roof rack.
e'd built a windshield for the carrier, to make the ride more comfortable for the dog," read the article.
Jordan Kaplan, the owner of Petaholics, a dog walking service in New York City,
and a lifelong dog owner and dog lover, said Romney's actions were uncalled for.
....What Happens to a Dog on a Roof Traveling 50 MPH?"
"Romney's dog - This is a distinction Mitt Romney probably could do without, but he is surely
the first presidential candidate to be attacked for putting a dog with diarrhea
in a carrier and tying it to the top of a station wagon.
Romney's defense: Seamus liked it. "He scrambled up there every time we went on trips,"
the Republican said during a campaign stop in Pittsburgh. "He got in all by himself and enjoyed it."
"As the oldest son, Tagg Romney commandeered the way-back of the wagon,
keeping his eyes fixed out the rear window, where he glimpsed the first sign of trouble.
''Dad!'' he yelled. ''Gross!'' A brown liquid was dripping down the back window,
payback from an Irish setter who'd been riding on the roof in the wind for hours.
As the rest of the boys joined in the howls of disgust,
Romney coolly pulled off the highway and into a service station.
There, he borrowed a hose, washed down Seamus and the car,
then hopped back onto the highway."
"Story about dog on car roof comes back to bite Romney
Critics, jokesters make issue of tale
TIME.com's Swampland blog has been flooded with more than 200 comments
from readers complaining of animal cruelty"
Romney's bad behavior Exposed by Seamus
"Romney Loses Nomination Over Dog Abuse?
Romney was traveling that summer with his wife, five sons, and Seamus to his parent's cottage on Lake Huron.
But hours into the ride, Seamus apparently suffered diarrhea,
which ran down the back window of the car. Romney's sons, all under 13, howled in disgust.
Romney pulled off the road into a service station.
There, he borrowed a hose, washed down Seamus and the car, and they drove on to Ontario.
.....David Kravitz wrote on BlueMassGroup, a liberal blog.
"It also strikes me as classic Romney: it solves a problem efficiently,
in a business-like manner, and with no regard whatsoever
for the suffering that the solution may cause."
To: Diogenesis
Cherry picked, sure. For example, Romney vetoed ESCR. That’s not in there - yet Romney is “pro-abortion.” More like the Massachusetts General Court is pro-abortion. When I have executive action within a few years and a statement from the early ‘90s I’ll go with the governing.
To: Diogenesis
“Professional RomneyBOT”
Hadly. LOL. But what does that make you - the professional anti-Romney SUPERbot?
To: Diogenesis
A ba-billion megabytes of bandwith for what? Just who is making a profession of this?
To: stockpirate
I was a Romney skeptic but I see now he was not as bad as some claim and probably was the best candidate to run against Obama given the economy. Too bad.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson