[Fichori]

“I am never on an anti-religious crusade (heck....been to religious worships more than some that ARE "religious") and only want your religion to be kept out of a science room.....period....it does not belong in a science room.” [excerpt, bold/red emphasis mine]

So you want our religion kept out of the 'science room'?

What about yours?

Several major proponents of Evolution have admitted that it is a religion.

For example, Michael Ruse said that ‘Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion—a full-fledged alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality.’ and that ‘Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.’

So, do you also want that kept out of the science room?

Personally, I'm all for teaching only testable sciences in public school science classes. (hint: From Goo To You By Way Of The Zoo Evolution isn't testable)

[ElectricStrawberry]

Welcome to unscientific Absurdistan.

ANY time ANYONE chooses to offer up EVIDENCE to disprove ANY scientific theorem.....they are free to do so, but it MUST be done according to the Method.
That means your religion and book stays outside the “science” room.

Darwin postulated what he did in a scientific manner...madly flailing outside the room with a book does NOTHING.