The entire discussion was about DNA. Now you cite one proviso about epigenome and think that absolves the ignorance of claiming that humans and chimps being more similar in DNA than either is to a gorilla was a “logical impossibility”? Not hardly GGG.
Humans and chimps are more similar in DNA, than either is to a gorilla. It is only deluded Creationist thinking that would make you so certain that it was a “logical impossibility”.
Actually, have been mentioning genetics, epigenetics, etc (i.e. the totality of what makes them similar and different) for some time now. As I have said many times, I do not subscribe to the reductionistic (and largely outdated) neo-Darwinian beads-on-string understanding of genetics.