Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

RNC Chair Michael Steele has been leashed-up by the pukeneos. They tell him what to do and what to say. Sunay on MTP, puke David Frum gave Steele his marching orders----"weaken the party's pro-life principles........or else." The pukeneos have a lot at stake---they get $paid handsomely to $squat in the Repub Party......pocketing $big bonuses to religiously cleanse the party of so/cons the pukes despise.

Pukeneo Billy Kristol blows whichever way the Beltway Winds are blowing. Kristol went from Moynihan's staff to Quayle's, from The Weekly Standard to the NYT, from Bush to Giuliani to McCain. And the crumbum is still as secretive as ever....spewing blue-blood beltway Republicanism, and smirkingly kicking conservatives to the curb.The Pukeneos KNOW just what the Nation needs---another Democrat Party (/s).

NEOS IMPROVE OBAMA'S SEX LIFE Obaman's sex life is about to improve greatly---as Kristol, Frum and the RINO-pukeneos line up for a turn under Obama's desk.

THE FACTS ARE THESE As Dims takeover three branches of the federal government and state and local legislatures all over the land, we can safely conclude the "powerhouse punk-neo political strategy" (/sarc) is a rank loser. The punks diabolical "foot in each camp" strategy destroys the sacrosanct two-party system. The punks pursue their own interests.......to the detriment of our country. Repubs were appalled to see Joe Lieberman shadowing McC, making sure he read from the punkneo script, while writing $100,000 checks to the Dims.....as LIEb pulled off his "bi-partisan scam." RINO Rooty Ghouliani was another disaster, forced on the party by the stupid punkneos. Rooty made political history with his losing punkneo-managed prez campaign----spending $60M and getting one delegate (that he shared). It would come as no surprise to find that abortion-worshipping, ACLU-fellating crook Madoff financed the punks' activities with sub rosa financial dealings. This needs to be looked into.

MEMO TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY FROM ITS DONORS

1. Our liberty is from God, not Government.

2. Our sovereignty is in our souls, not the soil.

3. Our security is through strength, not surrender.

4. Our prosperity is from the private sector, not the public sector.

5. Our truths are self-evident, not relative.

SOURCE Congressman Thad McCotter’s five GOP fundamental principles http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2204561/posts

If Steele still does not “get it” he should GTH out of our party.

1 posted on 03/16/2009 7:48:46 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Liz
>Our prosperity is from the private sector, not the public sector

To be fair it was
private sector money firms
and all their watchdogs

that took the money
from investors and made it
disappear like smoke . . .

2 posted on 03/16/2009 7:53:53 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
This tripe (as always the hammer of "neocon" does) dangerously dillutes between "New Conservatives" (David Frum, and RINO ilk) and any foreign policy hawk.

Sarah Palin, a foreign-policy neocon on training wheels

Barf.

The corner this drivel is coming from are the Buchanan and Ron Paul kooks who seriously suggests that Mullah Iran, Russia and their array of proxy rogues are harmless, tiny countries with which we can peacefully trade whike staying out of world affairs.

We need to get rid of the RINOs on the left and the isolationist Kook corner.

3 posted on 03/16/2009 7:56:30 AM PDT by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
OK, I'm confused.

If I liked Sarah Palin, am I a neo-con? If I favored the surge and winning in Iraq, am I a neo-con? If I favor America and American sovereignty, am I a neo-con? If I dislike everything Michael Steele has done/said so far, am I a neo-con?

Would someone please explain this gobbledy-gook to me?!

4 posted on 03/16/2009 7:57:33 AM PDT by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
This is one of the most confusing articles that I've read in a LONG time.

The word “neocon” is tossed on virtually everyone.
I still have yet to find a cogent, clear, and unified answer as to what a neocon is.

7 posted on 03/16/2009 7:59:53 AM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

LOL. The NeoCons are working for Obama right now.


8 posted on 03/16/2009 8:00:54 AM PDT by BGHater (Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

read


12 posted on 03/16/2009 8:02:57 AM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Well, the truth is it's not our party, and no amount of persuading, moaning, threatening, working or losing is going to change that. "Moderates" are the vast majority of the GOP-- always have been, and always will be.

Reagan was a charismatic aberration who built his own groundswell with the people through his radio talks, so even the GOP couldn't ignore him. He was so successful that even old-school GOP moderates and beltway boys have found it prudent to hide their true beliefs by wearing the "conservative" label. And there's very good a reason Bush I was pushed to be the VP under Reagan, and Dole, Bush II, and McCain were our last 3 POTUS candidates: THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE PARTY IS "MODERATE".

Conseratives should stop beating that deceased equine and have nothing to do with the GOP. WE are the real RINOs.

16 posted on 03/16/2009 8:05:48 AM PDT by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

What happens when two or more people hold truths to be self-evident, but contradictory? Which self-evident truth, is real?


22 posted on 03/16/2009 8:10:24 AM PDT by stuartcr (If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

The surest way to detect mental midgetry is to see the term “neocon” used.


31 posted on 03/16/2009 8:19:46 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
"3. Our security is through strength, not surrender.

Huh? To rage against neo-cons and at the same time to support the central idea of the neo-conservative foreign policy??????

32 posted on 03/16/2009 8:21:30 AM PDT by alex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

Take Pat Buchanan’s isolationist crap elsewhere, please.


49 posted on 03/16/2009 8:43:35 AM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
With the fall of Donald Rumsfeld, on whom the neocons tried to blame the mismanaged Iraq War...

Neocons? Excuse me, but weren't neocons in lockstep with Rummy?

55 posted on 03/16/2009 8:56:39 AM PDT by meandog (The only "Bush" sounding surname worth a damn belongs to NASCAR's Kurt&Kyle Busch--not GEORGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

I may not always agree with the neocons, whoever they are, and whatever that means, but I understand their sentiments: The hegemony of the US throughout the world is a good thing. The fluff from Frumesque fruitcakes wanting to liberalize conservatism, the RINOcons, is beyond understanding. The RINOcons are the Republicans who gave us McCain, and caused the Neocons to defend him, while they slipped off and voted for 0. At least that’s how I see it this morning, so far.


56 posted on 03/16/2009 8:56:54 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

So, Pat Buchanan is our savior?


63 posted on 03/16/2009 9:05:27 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
So why not make a tidy list of the folks you want out of the party? Or maybe a pyramid with the purist Republicans on top.

This piece and the comments that follow are ridiculous and sad. William Kristol is the reason Sarah Pallin was chosen to run as VP, but now suddenly she's a "neo-con"?

We're doomed and not because every GOP member fails to check every box on the Conservative list.

69 posted on 03/16/2009 9:17:04 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
The neocons have so thoroughly socialized the Republican party that it has pretty much become what the Democrats were 10 years ago. Meanwhile the Democrats have become thoroughly communist now that they don't have to worry about any pesky conservatives coming out of the Republican party anymore.

Thanks neocon movement for making even communism sound preferable to what you scum bags are, which is just stupid. Hope you are happy with the Marxist States of America because you created them.

82 posted on 03/16/2009 9:53:14 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
This here is a pretty good thread you went and started! LOL! Seriously, this is the sort of discussion that makes FR worth its salt. Personally, I have come to the conclusion that all political labels are incapable of accurately describing any individual or group- at least consistently. I have seen rock-ribbed, pay as you go conservative business types go all misty-eyed at the mere mention of pork barrel projects for their backyards.

The only effective catalyst for agreement, IMHO, is the prospect of an impending doom that cuts through all of the emotional and egotistical mung that infects human consciousness. When things get bad enough, America seems to be able to muster enough spunk to get through. At least, IMHO, that has been true in our past.

Rhetorically, what difference will the bloviating of Buchanan, Kristol, Paul, etc. make after one- or more- of our city centers is turned into radioactive rubble in a millionth of a second? I watch and wait.
95 posted on 03/16/2009 10:19:08 AM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

When I see the word “neocon”, I always see it as a codeword used by kooks to really mean “Jew”.


96 posted on 03/16/2009 10:21:20 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

Define “neo-con”.

If you mean someone wholly dedicated to the protection and exportation of the American way of life, by force if necessary ... then count me among them. This is the definition used by most liberals — and it includes most of the great conservative minds of the last 50 years.

If you mean a shallow, big-government, free-spending “new conservative” — then I am not among them. This is the definition used by some conservatives.

If you think they are one-in-the-same, then you are mistaken.

When we argue with vauge terminology, people read into your cryptic labels whatever they want.

SnakeDoc


102 posted on 03/16/2009 10:31:12 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor (Proud Charter Member of the Republican Resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
You're full of stuff I can't mention here. This article is stuff I can't mention here, and your additional comments and parenthetical title addendum are stuff I can't mention here.

Your language is stuff I can't mention here, and your opinions are more disgusting than stuff I can't mention here. Get a life, you piece of stuff I can't mention here.

171 posted on 03/17/2009 5:27:43 AM PDT by Chunga (Vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson