Posted on 03/15/2009 5:06:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
ping
history in the making
This is where his community organizations in urban nieghborhoods through out the US will be utilized, recrute, equipe and fund just as well as our military. His own personel military force who will be beholden to him because they will be employed by him. SCARY, that they let him get away with even stating this let alone allowing him to implement it. This is Nazi Germany?
Of course, this isn’t much of a threat, probably — it’ll be used as a free summer camp to get the kids out of the ‘hood and out of their parents’ hair.
Sounds like he is provoking a showdown so he can institute marshal law.
You said — “All this takes time and several states are in the process of passing legislation that requires all candidates to present suitable identification credentials. If only one state has this law by 2012, the BHO will have to comply or withdraw.”
One of the states is my state, Oklahoma. The other two are Arizona and Missouri. I’m working with a legislator to get that through (just as a citizen...).
I was hoping to see about, maybe, 20 states to get it on the books. That would be an absolute nightmare for Obama.... :-)
We'll see it as a result of the inevitable terrorist attack here in the US. I think his Nat. Securtity Force goal is one of the many reasons he won't be all that strong on national or home land defense. He needs the "terroist attack" crisis to establish his brown shirt brigade.
Obama is a front man, and by watching the installation of the Clintonistas in his cabinet, it should be clear that OTHERS are actually at the heart of this election, and many other elections in past.
The CFR and Bildebergers control politics, wars etc...do some research on it, it’s out there.
They will not be employed by HIM. They will be funded by the government which means that, even though there mission will be to destroy us, we’ll be footing the bill.
I just don't believe that any such formal process was ever put in place. It runs counter to everything this nation stands for. We are not some third world banana republic that can have a miliary junta takeover the country. This is just plain bogus.
I hear what you’re saying.The soldiers aren’t the enemy-the slime that push gun control are the enemy.That’s who should reap the fire if things break down.
bttt
The "soldiers", whether military, national guard, or the militarized local police forces, have sworn to protect the very people who infringe our rights. It's an interesting ethical dilemma.
The entire "house of cards" which is gun control has been enabled by 70 years of purposeful mal-interpretations of the Miller case. Now that the cards are falling, it's time for the "soldiers" to start taking note of the fact that they have been on the wrong side for nearly a century. They owe us the duty of questioning their superiors and demanding explanations, lest the tyranny continue.
He needs a force that hasn’t sworn to protect the constitution, but has sworn personal loyalty to him.
Just like the SS and Hitler.
Revelation 12:12
...Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
Our freedom loving founders did not find compulsory militia service to be sickening. Freedom has a price, and as part of the social contract, we have to commit to defend the government that defends us. Now “when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism ...” You know the rest of the story.
I can envision the messiah using the ranks of the unemployed to create his own personal army cadre. Claim it as “voluntary” with plenty of freebees and perks. The higher the rank/zealot the greater the perks.
As agree with you to a point. However, if Nixon had wigged out in his final days and tried to use the military to stay in power. That could have been an interesting series of events.
As I recall, the article stated they had put a process to handle that if it happened.
As a source, well as best as I can recall it appeared in The Washington Post within a couple of months of Nixon leaving office.
If you have access to Nexus or another way to search old articles you would find it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.