Posted on 03/15/2009 5:06:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
He's EXACTLY what I thought he would be, but I've added more to his agenda in my head, that he hasn't even mentioned yet.
He IS working much faster than I thought possible.
If memory serves me, as I recall actually reading the article at the time, it was the JC’s that put it in to place.
And it was in fact a good plan on their part. IMHO
SchutzStaffel.
Obama’s handlers:
http://www.cfr.org/publication/18236/bernankes_speech_on_the_crisis_and_the_policy_response.html
http://www.moneymaker.com/money/bildebrg.htm
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/illuminati_and_cfr.htm
http://www.bilderberg.org/2003.htm
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Henry_Kissinger_Obama_should_act_to_0106.html
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/BILDER.HTM
http://www.bilderberg.org/1999mins.htm#NATO
http://www.prolognet.qc.ca/clyde/cfr.html
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_rockefeller01.htm
There are several other links on these websites that will add more info for your consideraton:
http://www.chuckbaldwinforum.com/obama-and-the-bildebergers-proof-t-211.html
David Rockefeller is a self-proclaimed communist in his memoirs, and heads up the Think Tank at CFR:
http://www.cfr.org/thinktank/
Jon has a lot of this info on his site in the internet articles dating back ten yrs:
http://www.jonchristianryter.com
I agree. Leads me to wonder again out loud how much of the ‘stuff’ on this board is from trolls. Watch your step(s).
The militia used to be mandatory. And you didn’t get paid for drill. You did if you were called into state or federal service.
Well, this is the Amendment that pertains to terms in office...
Amendment XXII
Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.
—
Now, it takes a 2/3s vote of the House of Representatives and of the Senate to propose an amendment. Then it takes 3/4 of the states in the United States to ratify such an amendment. And usually, there a time frame attached to the period allowed for approval. That is usually written into the amendment itself.
I don’t see it possible for Obama or the Democrat Congress to be able to get a 3/4 ratification vote by the states to give Obama a ‘lifetime presidency”... LOL...
COMSEC is your friend. And this, friend, is an unsecure channel.
Next question: do you think compulsory service is a desirable scenario now that this country has tried and been successful recruiting an all-volunteer force?
Amen, brother. Lock and load.
After the revolution, most of the states disbanded their militias, but New Jersey did not. Their militia served as a sort of state police, unless they got called up. At least this is what I learned from doing genealogical searches. Each town was expected to appoint or elect a representative to the militia, who doubly served as sheriff and militia member and was paid by the town.
It’s really disconcerting, because you can see how it can be “sold” to the public. I trust the military we already have, don’t see the need for any more militias...unless, of course, they’ve got more in mind that would prompt an armed citizens’ revolt.
Very powerful pictures. I have the same lack of “enthusiasm” for the usurper in chief as the patriots in picure #1. There is only one person in that picture who is not a patriot, sadly he is masquerading as “president” these days. Sigh.
Its actually way beyond not good. I was waiting for him to find an opportune time to bring that up. Just waiting.
It reminds of a scene in the movie the “Blue Kite,” about the cultural revolution in China.
A poor woman saved and saved to make some dumplings for the Chinese new year. She made them and had them cooling on her window sill. About that time a group of cadres comes marching by. One of the woman in the group sees her dumplings and starts denouncing her as a greedy imperialist traitor or some such nonsense. She confiscated her dumplings and marched on screaming.
For some reason, this scene has remained stuck in my conscious for the last 10 years. I fear that will be our fate soon. I also recommend that everyone see that movie.
Related:
http://conservativexpress.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-revisits-national-citizens.html
and
http://conservativexpress.blogspot.com/2009/02/did-dod-directive-140410-establish.html
No they did not disband their militias. Where the hell did you get that falsehood. The Militia Act of 1792 was law of the land until the 1860s, and the current militia laws (10 USC 311) bears many similarities to the original act.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.