Skip to comments.
Obama is taking 2nd look at tax on benefits (To Pay for Socialized Medicine)
The Minneapolis/St. Paul Star-Tribune / The New York Times ^
| March 14, 2009
| Jackie Calmes and Robert Pear
Posted on 03/14/2009 3:29:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
"I was for it before I was against it." Where have we heard that before?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wonder how many obama supporters now have buyers remorse...
2
posted on
03/14/2009 3:34:28 PM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Obama administration is signaling to Congress that the president could support taxing some employee health benefits, as several influential lawmakers and many economists favor, to help pay for an overhaul of the health care system. As long as the family doesn't make $250,000 I feel safe from taxation.
We were promised. ; )
3
posted on
03/14/2009 3:35:10 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'm confused....
Why would the government TAX health benfits just to pay them out again through entitlement programs?
Oh wait... now I get it.
4
posted on
03/14/2009 3:35:58 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Here’s where BO bites many of his liberal backers in the ass.
To: 2banana
They won’t care, they are the ones having the rest of us pay for their health care anyway.
6
posted on
03/14/2009 3:37:18 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
In millions of dollars worth of television advertisements last fall, Obama criticized his Republican rival for the presidency, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, for proposing to tax employer-provided health benefits.That McCain sure knows how to run a lousy campaign.
Worst ever in American history.
7
posted on
03/14/2009 3:38:14 PM PDT
by
Rome2000
(Peace is not an option)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
....since it is similar to one he denounced in the presidential campaign as "the largest middle-class tax increase in history." I remember throwing things at the TV when this clown was shamelesssly demagoguing this issue.
Change! Change we can BELIEVE in!
8
posted on
03/14/2009 3:38:18 PM PDT
by
denydenydeny
("I'm sure this goes against everything youÂ’ve been taught, but right and wrong do exist"-Dr House)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I was for it before I was against it." Where have we heard that before?That was then and this is now. LOL!
9
posted on
03/14/2009 3:38:23 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
many economists favor And what about the many economists that dont favor it?
10
posted on
03/14/2009 3:39:00 PM PDT
by
lowbridge
(It's not that liberals are ignorant, it's that they know so much that isn't so - Ronald Reagan)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This will push more employers to drop plans, increasing the uninsured, thus increasing the costs of his socialized plan while removing his proposed funding mechanism. F ing Brilliant!
11
posted on
03/14/2009 3:39:15 PM PDT
by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Requiescat In Pace)
To: Kozak
This will push more employers to drop plans, increasing the uninsured, thus increasing the costs of his socialized plan while removing his proposed funding mechanism.All that has to be done is to tax cigarettes to make up the difference.
See how easy that is?
12
posted on
03/14/2009 3:42:33 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
13
posted on
03/14/2009 3:43:54 PM PDT
by
Colonial Warrior
(Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is Obama considering taxing the part of the premium the employer pays for health insurance, the actual benefits the employee receives as reimbursements, or both?
To: 2banana
Wonder how many obama supporters now have buyers remorse...Doesn't really matter. The media will never cover them, interview them or admit they exist. Nothing like bias by omission.
15
posted on
03/14/2009 4:07:59 PM PDT
by
Kieri
(The Conservatrarian)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We must clean out the sewer that is Washington DC.
To: Right_in_Virginia
It reads to me that he wants to tax the amount that the company pays in your faver as income.
17
posted on
03/14/2009 4:14:19 PM PDT
by
raybbr
(It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
To: Kozak
He WANTS employers to drop plans...
We WANTS cost to go up to the public...
He WANTS chaos..
He WANTS people to be screaming for the Feds to rescue them...
This is his little perfect National Health Care storm....
Remember....never let a good crisis go to waste.
18
posted on
03/14/2009 4:15:30 PM PDT
by
Osage Orange
(Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If you’re not outraged, you’re probably a Marxist.
To: raybbr
That is exactly what they want. For most people universal health care is a wonderful idea in theory. However, when they understand that they will actually have to pay for it and the realization of how much it will cost will quickly turn the tide against it.
Most people, even if thought that they would be tax on health benefits, didn't understand that the cost will include your cost as well as the cost that the employer pays. It will amount to a tidy sum in most cases even for crappy coverage.
20
posted on
03/14/2009 4:32:45 PM PDT
by
WHBates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson