Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FrogMom
Kansas58 ~ Obama tells us that production of said documents would “embarass” him. That is reason enough to contine.

FrogMom ~ You have a source for that? I'd love to see it.

Your wish is my command...

here

95 posted on 03/14/2009 6:50:50 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 54 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: null and void; 2ndDivisionVet
From the text.
President Obama says that there would be embarrassment to him in producing the documents.

Having been ruled by a Prime Minister in Canada at one time, who somehow does resemble the new President, there may be another problem. I kept mulling over a word that will not leave. Perhaps I am overstating the case.

Dictionary.com -re Random House Dictionary. Random House 2009.
Fiat

1. An authoritative degree,sanction or order: a royal fiat.

2. A formula containing the word fiat,by which a person in authority gives sanction.

3.An arbitrary degree or pronouncement,esp by a person or group of persons having the absolute authority to enforce it: The king ruled by fiat.

There are a number of definitions on Dictionary.com of this word. I do hope for the Constitution of the United States of America. I just wonder if by sheer political will and force, with an obviously fragile press, that the powers that be, could enforce a fiat? ie: We are big enough to tell anyone what the rules are- our rules.

I pray that they will not.

96 posted on 03/14/2009 7:32:40 PM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Thank you, sir!


97 posted on 03/14/2009 8:00:29 PM PDT by FrogMom (No such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson