“What’s to study?”
As I recall the gripe against Clintoon was that there was no discussion/study on what the impact to the force would be.
According to the article, the generals/admirals who made the decision had no empirical data, only subjective conclusions.
If you have empirical data...
I don't imagine the generals/admirals who made the decision had no empirical data on serving dog s**t on a regular basis in the chow hall either, only subjective conclusions.
You'd probably have better luck advocating perversion in the military over at the daily cos or the DUmp.