There is no evidence to suggest it's fake, some anonymous blogger with a phony Ph.D.'s absurd claims notwithstanding.
But your response is PRECISELY why this issue needs to be bought before an appropriate ccourt of law, with all witnesses under oath, subject to cross examination and the documents or certified copies therof subject to examination.
Every single judge that has looked at the case disagrees with you. I guess they must all be in on the conspiracy.
“Every single judge that has looked at the case disagrees with you. I guess they must all be in on the conspiracy.”
Not on the merits of the case. Almost all these cases have been dismissed on “standing,” with the exception of the Hollister case, as that corrupt idiot Robertson served up grounds for appeal when he cited internet buzz as a substitute for a judicial examination of a legal dispute over an objective fact, i.e, Does Hussein meet the constitutional criteria for president? He has given the plaintiffs ample grounds for appeal.
“There is no evidence to suggest it’s fake, some anonymous blogger with a phony Ph.D.’s absurd claims notwithstanding.”
Hussein’s lawyers don’t seem to have much faith in that bogus COLB either. They have not referenced it in any of their legal filings.
Pinging MM
Where are you?