[curiosity]

Sure, but I was replying to a response from curiosity, not trying to state fact. (S)he made the claim that there were no standards between "some offices" in post 199, and I was playing back that line of reasoning to rebut the claim.

Okay, so it's possible the single state office that issues them changed the form at some point. I don't see why you think it's such a big deal.

[Political Junkie Too]

I never said it was a big deal. If you reread my post 198, I said it could simply be a change in the form that was not documented as a wholesale revision.

However, I do think it is a big deal if a state has a lax procedure for securing its official documents, including layouts, formats, etc. They need a better change control process if new terminology can make its way to a form without being defined somewhere for reference, otherwise, what are the recipients to make of it? How is a registrar in another state (or someone utilizing the document as evidence supposed to interpret the same form with different wordings, without a reference to guide them?

-PJ