[Political Junkie Too]

There's nothing in Hawaii state law or in any documentation put out by the DOH that attaches any significance to the difference.

Would you agree that the fact that there is a difference is significant? Wouldn't you expect something like that to be standardized across the state? If they can't even standardize on the form from one office to the next, what else have they not standardized?

And what are we to infer about a non-standard form for the purposes of qualifying the highest office in the land?

-PJ

[curiosity]

Would you agree that the fact that there is a difference is significant?

Not unless there's either Hawaii state law or the DOH somewhere officially indicates the difference is meaningful. As far as I can tell, there is nothing to this effect. Therefore, I don't think the difference means anything.