Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Born In America

I believe you’re referring to Posse Comitatus?

Because if so, that’s a federal act...but it’s not in the Constitution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

This act explicitly prohibits the military or any other such unit (like the National Guard) under federal control from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States.

Now the question becomes: is halting the drug cartels streaming past our open border a matter of law enforcement, or is it more of a military matter?


36 posted on 03/12/2009 8:00:52 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Ultra Sonic 007
Posse Comitatus only applies to Army forces. The Naval forces are not and never were subject to it.
Specifically, the Marine Corps is not subject to Posse Comitatus
41 posted on 03/12/2009 8:06:25 AM PDT by Obamageddon (Birth certificate and college transcripts will be required for Federal employment, Mr. Soetero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
This act explicitly prohibits the military or any other such unit (like the National Guard) under federal control from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States.

That is correct in terms of the United States Military as defined by the respective branches. However, the President can call forth the Militia(National Guard)and the President cannot organize, arm or discipline the Militia. All of those powers belong to Congress....

Article 1, Section 8

45 posted on 03/12/2009 8:10:28 AM PDT by Born In America ("O.B.A.M.A.: One Big A** Mistake, America....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
a matter of law enforcement, or is it more of a military matter?

I believe it could be considered an invasion which would justify military action

48 posted on 03/12/2009 8:11:20 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush - and zer0 has already failed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
This act explicitly prohibits the military or any other such unit (like the National Guard) under federal control from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States.

Here is a little history on that "Act"...

http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/parameters/04autumn/felicett.pdf

67 posted on 03/12/2009 8:53:09 AM PDT by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

I call it what it is, the Mexican have an open insurgent criminal rebellion on their hands. It is located directly on our border and is a clear threat to Americans on this side. Nothing in the constitution that i can see prevents our military forces being deployed in a defensive posture along the national border.

We deploy Naval and Air Forces for other threats at the border, and dont just assume every incursion is handled with a fine from the FAA or a visit from a customs agent.


79 posted on 03/12/2009 9:28:36 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson