Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xjcsa

You had my blood boiling with the headline but it wasn’t so bad. As long as he’s for RvW being overturned. Let the states decide.


5 posted on 03/11/2009 9:06:08 PM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exist

Not true.

No state has the right to decide that a certain class of people are not entitled to protection from homicide.

Any state that designates any class of people as undeserving of the protection of the law should be expelled from the Union.


71 posted on 03/11/2009 10:34:27 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: exist
The job description Of a Republican National Committee Chairman does not include leaving conservatives confused, defensive, and bickering in the wake of every television interview. The job calls for a chairman who can render the opposition defensive and bickering.

Ask yourself how Haley Barbour or Newt Gingrich would have answered last question.

No one in America is more vulnerable on the abortion issue than President Barak Obama who condoned abandoning babies simply to die who miraculously survived botched abortions. Steel is not even smart enough to recognize a question about abortion as an invitation to tee off on Obama's murderous depravity. Once the liberal media begins to understand that such questions hurt their party because effective spokesman for the party exploit the opening, they will stop laying snares for the unwary on the abortion issue. Instead Michael Steele was so obtuse that he actually attempted to answer the question on the interrogator's terms. He is a fool.

He may be identical error with respect to the homosexuality question. Conservatives have the numbers on their side on this issue, Michael Steele managed to piss off both sides.

In answering these questions, he made the same mistake that he is made twice before, he tries to ingratiate himself with critics by conceding the premise and then weasel around his concession with mindless blather. So he accepts the premise of the Republican convention was like a Nazi gathering, for example. The man acts as though he is ashamed of conservative principles. He does not understand that it is impossible to apologize your way into becoming a majority party.

For the record, I have been opposed to this man since before his selection. I have opposed him because he does not have the candlepower or the charisma required to save a party that is on the verge of political oblivion. He does not understand the role of a national chairman and he does not have the forensic skills required to fulfill that role.

Michael Steele simply must go!


75 posted on 03/11/2009 10:39:37 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: exist

It’s actually a rather classic conservative position to have Roe v Wade overturned and the decision go back to the states.

I of course would like it banned totally and immediately, but I don’t find Steele’s position unusual.

The day Roe v Wade gets overturned, I don’t think I’ll be able to do anything but praise God all day.


111 posted on 03/11/2009 11:58:24 PM PDT by Marie2 (Ora et labora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: exist; Marie2
Let the states decide on Roe.

Got it in one.
203 posted on 03/15/2009 3:56:10 PM PDT by Category Four (Joy, Fun, the Joke Proper, and Flippancy ... Flippancy is the best of all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson