Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: surfer
Regardless of the issue we should let the states decide on what will be allowed.

If you think some states should have the power to alienate the unalienable right to live, which of your other unalienable rights are you prepared to allow states to alienate??

151 posted on 03/12/2009 7:43:58 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Pro-choice for states is pro-choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: All

New tagline...


152 posted on 03/12/2009 8:02:05 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Pro-choice for states is pro-choice. This destroys America...it's all Pluribus and no more Unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

It is NOT my RIGHT to impose my views on others. As a Democracy our laws should represent a middle of the road perspective. It is the only way it will work.

The whole point on states deciding is it lets us as voters have an impact on what we allow our government to do. That is the EXACT reason why I no longer live in New England.

Any issue is up for compromise and the beauty of letting the states decide is you as an individual can decide which state best suits your beliefs and views and not that of some left loon whacko like Pelosi.

I am a pro-life person all the way but I also understand that a Federal ban on abortion will be just as bad as the extreme position Obama is taking. I also believe there are legitimate cases where abortion should be allowed, incest, rape, etc.


154 posted on 03/12/2009 8:04:35 AM PDT by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson