Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roamer_1

No, in fact, it is not.


137 posted on 03/12/2009 2:01:57 AM PDT by Chunga (Vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Chunga
No, in fact, it is not.

Yes, in fact, it is. Show me ANY precedence for the right of privacy trumping the right of life and I would cede your point, but other than RvW, and the malformed arguments leading to RvW, you will find none.

Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided- but on the basis that the woman, the state, and the federal governments have any business at all messing with the life within the woman- They have no jurisdiction to do so, as the Constitution does not grant them leave, without due process.

The right to LIFE is enumerated as God given from our very founding. It is the very first enumerated right declared in our very first document. If it is not granted to the weakest and most innocent among us, then it is granted to none.

You may try to hide this issue behind a thin veil of privacy, and parse the beginnings of personhood, but it is nothing but crafty lawyer-speak. There is no justice in it. There is no justice in it.

It is all about LIFE, and whether our foundations are as true and solid as our forefathers meant them to be, and whether we will be true to them, and honor them as we must, ere we will surely die as a nation, and as a people.

There is a reason God the Father was called upon to witness the intentions of those men, those who signed the Declaration which made us free. It is His justice we rely upon, and preserve in our laws. Pervert that justice, and there will be no justice at all.

139 posted on 03/12/2009 2:42:49 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson