Not for some years now- The Pro-Life movement adopted a position of Constitutional protections about the time they turned to a Constitutional amendment as a preference to overturning Roe v. Wsde.
The argument that the Right to Life belongs to the states is an invalid one, and a distraction- It can never be won, because it is wrong.
That isn't the argument.
“The Pro-Life movement adopted a position of Constitutional protections about the time they turned to a Constitutional amendment as a preference to overturning Roe v. Wade.”
the most popular ones simply repealed roe v wade. It may be easier to repeal roe via amendment than expect the SC to get its act together. At least it makes repealing Roe a national campaign issue and if that results in electing more pro-life conservatives then that can result in some good even if Roe isn’t immediately repealed.