Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suspects refuse to give blood in DUI crackdown in Palm Beach County
South Florida Sun-Sentinel ^ | 3/1/09 | Dianna Cahn

Posted on 03/11/2009 6:59:36 PM PDT by elkfersupper

Surrounded by flashing red and blue lights, the man in red leather sandals lifted one foot off the ground and waited as the deputy kept time. Then, finding that the man had failed the sobriety test, the deputy pulled the man's hands behind his back and shackled them. The man stood in a strip mall parking lot where he pulled over after an undercover deputy noticed him swerving in and out of his lane on Military Trail and he struck the median, said Sheriff's Cpl. Scott Yoder, who assisted with the arrest. The undercover deputy charged the driver with cocaine possession. Then a deputy made the DUI arrest. It was a moment repeated often Friday night, the first of a two-night countywide crackdown on drunken driving that involved more than 100 law enforcement officers. Twenty-six people were arrested Friday night on DUI charges, according to Capt. William Kenny, head of the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office traffic division. At least four refused to submit to a blood test, the latest tool officials planned to employ against drunken driving. The Sheriff's Office, working closely with the State Attorney's Office, sparked controversy when it decided to seek a judge-approved search warrant to take blood from anyone who appeared drunk and refused a breath test. Opponents argue that forced blood tests violate Florida statute. But State Attorney Michael McAuliffe said other Florida counties upheld the techniques and the uproar was "much ado about nothing." "I am not sure what the controversy is," McAuliffe told officers before the patrol.

(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: alcohol; dui; dwi; madd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Vampire bloodsuckers with MADD mother supervision.
1 posted on 03/11/2009 6:59:36 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

If they get to the point of wanting to take blood, you’re going to jail period. Found that one out several years ago.

They couldn’t get me on a breathalyzer or a field sobriety test so they arrested me and took me to the hospital and then to jail.


2 posted on 03/11/2009 7:04:04 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

LOL!

I couldn’t care less about the so called “rights” of drunks driving.


3 posted on 03/11/2009 7:04:40 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

But if it saves the life of one child, it’s worth it!!!


4 posted on 03/11/2009 7:04:43 PM PDT by Huntress (Proud owner of Norman/Norma, the transsexual attack cat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

What about the rights of sober drivers?


5 posted on 03/11/2009 7:06:48 PM PDT by csmusaret (You can't spell Democrat without R-A-T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Its about all our rights.


6 posted on 03/11/2009 7:07:20 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (It's time for the grown ups !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Define "drunk".

The experts and the law seem to differ and change from day-to-day.

7 posted on 03/11/2009 7:08:05 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

I couldn’t care less about the so called “rights” of drunks driving.


I care plenty about the rights of “drunks” driving.


8 posted on 03/11/2009 7:12:33 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Obamanomics=Obamageddon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
I couldn’t care less about the so called “rights” of drunks driving.

I was once one of those so called drunks. Unfortunately I was sober but it still cost me a night in jail, the cost of towing and impound, the cost of a blood test at the hospital, plus time spent going to court waiting for them to produce evidence that never materialized.
9 posted on 03/11/2009 7:12:50 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Forced blood tests? Hell...that crap don’t fly even up here in the Massachusetts Gulag.


10 posted on 03/11/2009 7:14:04 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Despite all my rage, I am still just a rat in a cage...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

They aren’t “forced” here but you’ll go to jail if you refuse. LOL


11 posted on 03/11/2009 7:19:20 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
They couldn’t get me on a breathalyzer or a field sobriety test so they arrested me and took me to the hospital and then to jail.

And then?

12 posted on 03/11/2009 7:19:44 PM PDT by TankerKC (It's July, 1956.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Wait until the cops themselves start doing it.

Now, in most jurisdictions that condone this travesty, they at lease give lip service to the warrant process and MIGHT arrange for a qualified phlebotomist.

I wouldn't be surprised if they start sucking it out of the gutter after the execution soon.

13 posted on 03/11/2009 7:22:26 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
it still cost me a night in jail, the cost of towing and impound, the cost of a blood test at the hospital, plus time spent going to court waiting for them to produce evidence that never materialized.

And then the case was dismissed and it still cost damn near as much as if I had been found guilty.
14 posted on 03/11/2009 7:23:25 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: elkfersupper
The Sheriff's Office, working closely with the State Attorney's Office, sparked controversy when it decided to seek a judge-approved search warrant to take blood from anyone who appeared drunk and refused a breath test. Opponents argue that forced blood tests violate Florida statute. But State Attorney Michael McAuliffe said other Florida counties upheld the techniques and the uproar was "much ado about nothing."

I don't know Florida statute, but if there is probably cause, the suspects are screwed on Federal Case law.

With so many refusals, the warrants did not appear effective, said Miami-based DUI attorney Michael Cohen, who argued that under Florida statute, it was illegal to force someone to comply with a blood test unless an accident caused serious injury or death. "I thought the whole point of the warrant was they could strap them down and take it against their will, just like they do with serious bodily injury," Cohen said. "It seems like this failed for them."

Maybe they have a shot there. If's that Florida law, it seems cut and dry, but even with my defense leanings, I take a defense attorney's word for what it's worth - a guy whose job is to stand up for his clients.

16 posted on 03/11/2009 7:30:00 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Obama = Jimmy Carter II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

It’s nice when you can make them look like fools.

In my case I went to court 4 different times for arraignment and the prosecutor always had to tell the judge the evidence hadn’t arrived from the hospital. Finally on the 5th date the prosecutor wrote a number down on a piece of paper anb said that it was my BAC and if I plead guilty it would go easy on me. I said “OK I’m ready to enter a plea” and plead not guilty which put the prosecutor on the spot. He could either charge me without any evidence or move for dismissal. LOL I better never cross him again.


17 posted on 03/11/2009 7:31:49 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
I couldn’t care less about the so called “rights” of drunks driving.

You should.

I don't DUI, don't condone it, and those who are convicted of it should not be on the road for a long time.

That aside, everyone should have the right to a fair trial, and our constitutional rights (search and seizure) are very important and have been eroded heavily since the days of the Terry stop.

18 posted on 03/11/2009 7:32:58 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Obama = Jimmy Carter II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

I’m not eager at all to be on the road with a bunch of drunks careening around. These people have a right to be secure in their persons, though. Forced blood tests have more than just a whiff of totalitarianism about them. Get them off the road in some other, more Constitutional and less intrusive manner, please.


19 posted on 03/11/2009 7:40:20 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

And if it saves the life of one illigal alien, it’s worth it, never mind his status.


20 posted on 03/11/2009 7:46:27 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson