You misunderstood.
I meant you weren’t taking a stand on whether or not you were curious about my claim in post # 124.
Instead, you state “I don’t have to be curious.” This is a leftist tactic.
Rather than make a declarative comment on any given issue—any issue whatsoever—the leftist makes a general and neutral comment about it, thus giving the appearance of having taken a stand when they in fact have remained neutral.
Maybe you will think about this, and light will be cast upon the notion that liberal thought is duplicitous. Maybe it will appear less favorable to you.
Well.., if I was curious about everything that happened around me, I would never get anything done... :-)
I do have to be selective in the nature of curiosity, in order to function normally — so one takes the things of “highest priority” and works on the way down. Of course, one never gets to everything.
But, to put it into perspective, and talking about books, the one by Bernard Goldberg was deserving of *attention* from my curiosity, more so than an unpublished author, such as yourself...
Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0895261901
And..., of course, like I said — I do agree with him.
—
[... get “published” in your manuscript and I may become “more curious”... LOL... ]