Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

Since marriage is a sacrament of the Church in reality its not the states role to define it anyway.


26 posted on 03/11/2009 7:03:22 PM PDT by lucias_clay (Its times like this I'm glad I'm a whig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lucias_clay
Since marriage is a sacrament of the Church in reality its not the states role to define it anyway.

I hate to admit it, but I agree with you.

A part of me would be just fine with this bill, but another part of me is screaming a warning that this will continue the undermining of the institution of marriage... possibly pushing it off a cliff.

There's something about saying, "I'd like you to meet my husband," that, "I'd like you to meet my domestic partner," just doesn't do.

29 posted on 03/11/2009 8:44:59 PM PDT by Marie ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: lucias_clay

No it doesn’t belong in the realm of the state, but the state should support it.

The reason is because the family is man’s first government. This is where we begin to respect authority. The state should strongly support it, not promote anarchy.


30 posted on 03/11/2009 9:13:20 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson