Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
Nothing to discuss actually. In a rational world that would be the way things were.

"Civil" marriage shouldn't even exist. Period.

It's nothing more than an excuse for further State intrusion into areas it has no business being.

Most States are failing miserably at fulfilling their most basic responsibilities as it is. Allowing them any say into what is or is not a 'marriage' is simply silly.

L

30 posted on 03/11/2009 2:24:30 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker
Nothing to discuss actually. In a rational world that would be the way things were.
"Civil" marriage shouldn't even exist. Period.

How long have you had this megalomaniacal blind spot separating opinion from reality?

Two thousand years of tradition and cultural norms out the window because you think it should?

The tempest is about a word.
The perverts want to deny its continued use by everyone else.
Not rational at all. Period.

36 posted on 03/11/2009 4:09:29 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson