[tacticalogic]

The public are hte ones that are being duped by these charlatans, but the tide is turnign as people start examining the truth more carefully- so the scientists’ ‘consensus’ hold little weight when examined against the truth- not really concerned with ‘convincing’ them of hteir mistake- their religion does not hold precendence over the truth

I think you're just whistling past a graveyard, and your tactics are just convincing people that you'll say anything derogatory about scientists in general because your religious beliefs are being threatened.

[CottShop]

lol- my beleiefs aren’t being htreatened- just answering the silyl arguments against htem- tyou know- the silly arguments that pretend microeovlution is macroevolution, pretend mutaitons are endowed with magical powers, pretend that natural, biological, chemical, and mathematical laws don’t exist when it comes to macroeovlution?

Trust me, the science supports my beleifs just fine- it’s yours that is in trouble. Speaking hte TRUTH about scientists who both are unwilling to ever cede evidences, and who ostracise and malign and belittle those that don’t tow the darwinian line isn’t derogatory- it’s callign htem to the carpet to account for hteir deception- most intentionally- some ignorantly