Are you trying to say that organisms with very different phenotypes also have very different genomes? I don’t think so. There are so many genetic similarities among dissimilar organisms that they had to move away from the old system of classification. There is no way to prove evolution but it is logical and (nearly) complete enough to serve as a suitable explaination if and when a better explaination arrives. The Bible does not say HOW God did all those things, it just says that he did it.
A creationist seems to have only two choices as of today:
1. God used genes as the template for all life and we are able to study it.
2. All life was created fully formed and we have no idea how. Time to start experimenting.
[[2. All life was created fully formed and we have no idea how. Time to start experimenting.]]
YES we DO have an idea how, and we also know that it is impoissible for single cells to evolve the necessary higher metainfo that is present in all highly IC systems- completed species- The article I posted above also explains that there is NO direct evidence of macroevolution, and that species simply hsow up fully formed, and Baraminology shows discontinuity, NOT continuity as claimed by macroevolutionists who rely on highly imaginitive scenarios for which they have no proof- worse yet, for which the biological evidnece refutes- Our position is NOT as dire as you make it out to be I’m afraid!
[[Are you trying to say that organisms with very different phenotypes also have very different genomes? I don’t think so. There are so many genetic similarities among dissimilar organisms that they had to move away from the old system of classification.]]
“They” Can do whatever they like- the ‘similarities’ do NOT take into account hte billions and billions of DISSIMILARITIES- “They” can deny common design all they like, but similarities just furhter point to common design while hte DISSIMILARITIES also strongly indicate uniqueneses of kinds- these dissimilarites are what seperate kinds, and furthermore, species own unique species specific parameters PREVENT the kinds of continuities macroevolutionists claim happened in the ‘past at some point’ despite a complete lack of evidence to support htis claim-
[[There is no way to prove evolution but it is logical and (nearly) complete enough to serve as a suitable explaination if and when a better explaination arrives.]]
Actually NO it isn’t! It DEFIES natural laws, biological, mathematical, and chemical laws- the very laws that are the underpinnings of hte very science that ignores the laws- quite hte contradiction there dont’chathink?