Posted on 03/11/2009 7:01:30 AM PDT by Ravnagora
On Monday, Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair announced that Charles Freeman had withdrawn his name from consideration for the post of Chairman of the National Intelligence Council (NIC), ending weeks of acrimonious debate that had been triggered by Freemans nomination. But while Freeman has receded from the spotlight, his selection to a critical intelligence post despite a deeply troubling political background lingers as a dark cloud over the Obama administration.
In the sensitive role of Chairman of the NIC, Freeman would have been privy to state secrets and would have advised President Obama on matters of national security. Yet Freemans ties to foreign powers raised obvious questions regarding conflicts of interest. Moreover, Freeman has made controversial public statements that fly in the face of official U.S. policy, on subjects like the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Americas relationship with Saudi Arabia, and even the 1989 massacre in Communist Chinas Tiananmen Square.
Since 1997 Freeman, a former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and senior envoy to China, has been the president of the nonprofit Middle East Policy Council (MEPC), an organization with close ties to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In a 2006 interview, Freeman explained that MEPC had received a $1 million endowment, thanks to the generosity of King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia. The following year, Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal bin Abdulaziz al-Saud gave another $1 million to MEPC. (Alwaleeds offer of money to New York City after 9/11 was famously turned down by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani.)
Furthermore, researcher Ashley Rindsberg recently revealed Freemans pre- and post-9/11 business connections with the bin Laden family, which have donated tens of thousands of dollars a year to the MEPC. Rindsberg also discovered donations to Obamas presidential campaign by Freemans Projects International, a company that develops international business deals.
Many of Freemans public statements during his time at MEPC also suggest that his ties to the Kingdom included identifying with certain aspects of the Saudis worldview. Among its other activities, the MEPC proudly issued an unabridged version of the controversial 2006 essay The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, by professors John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt. The report claimed that American Jews had a stranglehold on U.S. politicians and decision makers. Freeman endorsed the report and boasted, No one else in the United States has dared to publish this article, given the political penalties that the Lobby imposes on those who criticize it.
Congressman Pete Hoekstra (R-MI) and others opposed to Freemans appointment had also cited a speech delivered by Freeman in 2002, in which Freeman seemed to make apologies for Islamic terrorism while condemning the United States. Said Freeman:
Saudis and other Gulf Arabs were shocked by the level of ignorance and antipathy displayed by Americans toward them and toward Islam after September 11. The connection between Islam and suicide bombing is a false connection. Kamikaze pilots were not Muslims And what of America's lack of introspection about September 11? Instead of asking what might have caused the attack, or questioning the propriety of the national response to it, there is an ugly mood of chauvinism. Before Americans call on others to examine themselves, we should examine ourselves.
Besides his longstanding ties to Saudi Arabia, Freeman also sits on the international advisory board of the China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), which is majority owned by the Chinese government. The Corporation has investments in Sudan as well as Iran and other countries other countries sometimes at odds with the United States. During Freemans time on the board, the CNOOC was investigated by the State Department for violating the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act.
Freemans close working relationship with the Chinese government seems to have influenced his political views so much so that, in a 2006 internet post that is only now receiving media scrutiny, Freeman criticized the Chinese authorities for not moving swiftly enough to crush democratic protestors and dissidents assembled in Beijings Tiananmen Square.
[T]he truly unforgivable mistake of the Chinese authorities was the failure to intervene on a timely basis to nip the demonstrations in the bud, rather than -- as would have been both wise and efficacious -- to intervene with force when all other measures had failed to restore domestic tranquility to Beijing and other major urban centers in China. In this optic, the Politburo's response to the mob scene at Tiananmen stands as a monument to overly cautious behavior on the part of the leadership, not as an example of rash action .
I do not believe it is acceptable for any country to allow the heart of its national capital to be occupied by dissidents intent on disrupting the normal functions of government, however appealing to foreigners their propaganda may be. Such folk, whether they represent a veterans' Bonus Army or a student uprising on behalf of the goddess of democracy should expect to be displaced with despatch [sic] from the ground they occupy.
Unsurprisingly, 87 Chinese dissidents, many of whom have served stints in Chinese prisons for their part in the Tiananmen protests, have written President Obama to convey our intense dismay at your selection of Freeman. The dissidents noted that [n]o American in public life has been more hostile than Mr. Freeman toward the ideals of human rights and democracy in China.
Freeman's apologetics for Chinese authoritarianism fueled the fury over his nomination. Adding to the controversy was that, up until his withdrawal from the nomination, Freeman failed to submit the required financial disclosure forms required for all nominees, nor had he been formally vetted by the White House. Instead, an independent inspector had been charged with investigating Freemans foreign financial ties, following growing criticism of his appointment by senior members of the House of Representatives. And Freemans critics were only growing more vocal.
Shoshana Bryen, Senior Director for policy at the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, was among the first to denounce the Freeman appointment. In a telephone interview with FrontPage prior to Freemans sudden withdrawal, Bryen said that unhappiness with Obamas choice of Freeman goes beyond party lines. Bryen said that, although the Middle East Policy Council is a non-profit, Freeman actually worked as a lobbyist, albeit an unofficial one, because he took his money from people with a particular point of view, so his analysis of certain issue may be distorted by the fact of where the money came from. Bryen added that even if Saudi Arabias concerns mirror our own on occasion for instance, when it comes Irans possible acquisition of nuclear weapons Freemans relationship with the Kingdom suggests that he may be beholden to a foreign government.
Bryen found Freemans remarks about Tiananmen Square even more troubling. He still hasnt disavowed them, and he seems willing to consider that the requirements of an unelected government like that ruling Communist China, take precedent over the rights of helpless ordinary citizens to life, let alone freedom of assembly.
Echoing Bryens concerns was Laurent Murawiec, a Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute. In an interview conducted before Freeman withdrew his name from consideration, Murawiec told Front Page that Freeman is part of the crowd, the cabal, that includes the State Department and the CIA that under George W. Bush issued the mendacious National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iran. The reports conclusion that the Ayatollahs regime had stopped its efforts to weaponize its nuclear program was based on evidence that proved to be a lie.
The cabals policy, unchanged for decades, says Murawiec, is that despots and tyrants in the Arab-Muslim world should be supported for the sake of stability, and stability preserved for the sake of petroleum. Such stability, adds Murawiec, never lasts for long.
Freeman, if head of NIC, will skew and manipulate future National Intelligence Estimates and consistently leverage his position in the interest of his Saudi sponsors, and more broadly, of the Washington realist consensus.
The NIC does not dictate policy, allows Murawiec, but with an ignorant and inexperienced president like Barack Obama at the helm, the chances for a serious foreign policy-making process would be further destroyed with Charles Freeman as the NICs chairman.
How telling that someone like Freeman, before his fall, had been appointed by the Obama administration for such a sensitive position, especially one that did not require Congressional approval. Given Freemans undisputed ties to Saudi Arabia and China, any advice he would have offered the President could well have been compromised by conflicts of interest. The results might have proven fatal. Although Freeman was not personally appointed by Obama, the administration allowed the controversy to build for days without comment. The fiasco is another embarrassment for a new administration whose brief transition period has already been marred by similar examples of confusion and poor judgment coming out of the White House.
Obummer and another dumb dimwit.
If you have not yet filed your federal income tax forms, just scribble some pertinent resume items on the back of your Form 1040 and mail it in to Rahm Emanual. You won't need to worry about the IRS for 3, maybe 5 years.
More and more this administration reminds me of open mike night at a cheap karaoke dive.
Just curious...how does a guy who’s been an ambassador from Saudi and the Chicoms to us get to be a senior intel advisor to the U.S. government? Oh, he’s not? We sent him to those countries, not the other way around? Judging by his statements...you could have fooled me.
Would that they were as innocuous.
Now is different. We have someone that wants to be 'dictator of it all'. And wants to be the leader of the world. NOT new ... but one that is telling us that he is a ONE WORLD Internationalist. My observation. Those that have the power ... USE IT!
I thought the Clinton's were shockingly blatant IN THEIR DISREGARDING of roles and rules ... (when they first entered the WHITE HOUSE as President and first lady) ..
They moved quickly with their new programs (national health care), selecting Madeline Albright, among others of that ilk, disrespecting all the protocals and prestiage of the Oval Office. TRAVELGATE, having FBI files on all of Congress, etc. HILLARY'S CONNECTIONS TO THE ROSE LAW FIRM AND WHITEWATER GATE, VINCE FOSTER, TRyson foods scandal,... AND ON AND ON.
Fortunately they were tempered to an extent by Newt and his Contract With America. All that bru -ha -ha is 16 years ago now, but America survived it.
What we have now is different... and far worse...given Obamas true philosophy and basis ... He like Carter has
a very unrealistic vision of how to sustain a strong, vital, and viable America.
We are so s*rewed. Like Stalin did to the people of Russia, Ukraine, etc., deliberately starving millions of his countryman. IT IS COMING ... IF WE DO NOT get the attention of our Congress; and state leaders.
There is a bill in the works taking control of food; and it has very broad implications. Who and what can be grown. When the world buys our food; and we are sending it (98% to them) while we go hungry; it is too late then to stop the roller coaster. Wake Up AMERICA.. Do not be distracted and diverted from the real issues happening now. Look with clear eyes and see.
Thank God
With the three taxes (at least) upon all business, he will make unemployment soar to new levels and send businesses overseas.
My belief, he wants a new constitution and a new nation in his liberal image.
He has made an impressive beginning toward getting there.
Pray for God’s mercy on America and his people.
Having prayed for Faith's revival in this country, I have turned toward imprecatory prayers that sin would burn itself out of America. Thus I am praying that the current Liberal wickedness would be what it is to the Nth Degree such that America would have to expel it from the body.
Imprecatory Prayer Bump.
Personally I believe ‘Revelations 18’ is America.
for the Great Tribulation to come ... things must get worse
Deception of the people, is part of it.
We certainly have many that appear to be deceived now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.