Replies

This whole conspiratorial strategy of joining forces with a movement that believes 911 was a Bush controlled inside job is an embarrassingly losing strategy for conservatives.
Are you trying to imply that just because Berg, as a "Truther", has brought a birth certificate/eligibility suit that forces are being joined? Good luck with that.
I do, however, see a bunch of folks trying to persuade others that such a thing is true, even to the point of nicknaming people who want to see original documents as Birthers. (comparable to the nickname Truthers)

To the American public it represents a position that we know we can't compete in the arena of ideas.
How do you know this? The majority of the American public isn't even aware that people are demanding to see the original documents because, as you stated, many conservative pundits aren't even covering the issue.

So instead we'll promote conspiratorial theories that neither Clinton nor any of our Republican candidates raised during the presidential campaign to justify our lunacy.
No politician had to. Others did it. It was the New York Times that started the McCain issue...
McCain’s Canal Zone Birth Prompts Queries About Whether That Rules Him Out
And National Review started the Obama issue...
Obama Could Debunk Some Rumors By Releasing His Birth Certificate.
No conspiracy there, is there? It was looked into and resolved. The same can't be said for Obama.

If questioned on our lunacy we'll then cite the credentials of our fellow conspirators who to this day, still want to prosecute Bush and Cheney for causing the 911 attacks.
Ah, well, it's already been shown that you're attempting to establish guilt by association. A new sentence isn't going to help.

Blackbird...from the White Album.