OK, so 99,999 FReepers out of 100,000 predicted it.. Ever ask why the very, left LA Times gives him so much attention? Why Paul over everyone else who called it? Why not Hunter, Thompson, Friedman or Buckley (if you want to go back to historical predictions), etc, etc, etc? What is the difference? Who has the baggage that can be used against the Right?
Maybe the LA Times is finally so desparate that they are willing to try anything ... like telling the truth.