Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinbluhen51
OUTRAGEOUS! No way NO HOW!

Here was the first RED flag: particularly the power to regulate intrastate commerce That is so they can enforce taxing any purchases you make online or in another state.

Absolutely unconstitutional. And that is just the first red flag, this bill is full of them.

53 posted on 03/10/2009 12:58:10 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gidget7

ping


54 posted on 03/10/2009 2:01:13 PM PDT by elk ((A Member of the Silent 58)TM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: gidget7
particularly the power to regulate intrastate commerce

Sorry, but that was declared a non-issue back in the 30's. According to the Supreme Court, the government can look at the aggregated effects of any intrastate production (like growing wheat for your own faarm's consumption), and note that it has interstate implications... and thus, the Feds can regulate it. Nice, isn't it?

Now, the silly little fact that ANYTHING, seen in the national aggregate, has interstate implications, should not trouble anyome. That "interstate commerce" clause is now just as powerful as the "general welfare" clause (which, by the way, had nothing to do with transfer payments to poor folk, when written)... and that Tenth Amendment might as well be written in invisible ink.

92 posted on 03/15/2009 11:16:31 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson