Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F15Eagle

This is why the bush admin shouldn’t have overreached and just called people prisoners of war. Just wait until people like rush or tea-partyers get declared “enemy combatants” for disagreeing with the government, and held indefinitely without trial.


17 posted on 03/10/2009 5:07:26 AM PDT by OH4life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: OH4life

Actually, Bush et al under-reached. The “enemy combatants” should have been designated as spies, and summarily executed. The fact that President Bush saw the potential for (1) gleaning intel and (2) making a mistake in designating apprehended individuals were major causes of the decision to treat them as what they legally are - unlawful enemy combatants.

POWs are by definition uniformed enemy servicemen.


21 posted on 03/10/2009 5:15:27 AM PDT by MortMan (Power without responsibility-the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages. - Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson