Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leaders Discuss M1A1 Tank Proposal
Multi-National Force - Iraq ^ | Petty Officer 1st Class Jim Bane, USN

Posted on 03/08/2009 12:51:56 PM PDT by SandRat

BAGHDAD — Program managers from the United States and Iraq, along with representatives from the General Dynamics Contract Logistics Support (CLS) group, met to discuss the fielding of M1A1SA Abrams tanks for the Iraqi Army, March 4.

The tanks are scheduled to arrive over an 18-month period in groups of 35, according to Mark Bangsboll of Multi-National Security Transition Command - Iraq’s (MNSTC-I) Joint Headquarters Army Advisory Training Team Planning Office.

Charles Campbell, JHAATT M1A1SA program coordinator, said, “This meeting is meant to initiate dialog on the support and sustainment required for the M1A1SA program, as well as setting-up delivery, fielding, and training. The first regiment will begin full-scale training in December of 2010. From there, we would instruct and train on how to support and sustain these tanks. “

Eugene Meredith, General Dynamics CLS, said, “The new M1A1SA technology makes it perform better in a desert environment. The technology, related to the gunnery and air filtration systems, helps the new tank perform much better than the previous Iraqi fleet of mostly Russian T-72’s and French models.”

The presentation by CLS provided a detailed program including training for tank crews, a spare parts logistics program, including warehousing and inventory control, and a security agreement for sensitive weapons and communications systems featured in the M1A1SA Abrams.

According to Brig. Gen. Charles Luckey, deputy commanding general, MNSTC-I, Security Assistance Office, "Properly fielded and maintained, the M1A1 represents a quantum leap in the modernization of the Iraqi Army. The survivability, lethality and agility of this tank in a desert environment have been proven repeatedly."

MNSTC-I’s efforts in supporting the Ministry of Defense and the Iraqi Army represents a vital step towards ensuring Iraq’s self-sufficiency for the future.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: frwn; iraq; m1a1; tank
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2009 12:51:56 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; freekitty; A Navy Vet; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
If you would like to be added to / removed from FRWN,
please FReepmail Sandrat.

WARNING: FRWN can be an EXTREMELY HIGH-VOLUME PING LIST!!

2 posted on 03/08/2009 12:52:15 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I was just thinking that the M1A1 is getting a bit long in the tooth. Not that I really know anything about armor. I doubt we have anything on the drawing board to replace it tho.


3 posted on 03/08/2009 12:57:13 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

“I was just thinking that the M1A1 is getting a bit long in the tooth.”

I know little of armor but what I’ve read is that you can upgrade certain systems and vastly improve the whole. Its one of the best tanks in the world already.

Put new electronics or engine and you don’t need to start from scratch.


4 posted on 03/08/2009 12:59:28 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
"I doubt we have anything on the drawing board to replace it tho."

I'd be willing to bet that the guys who design this stuff have plenty of suitable replacements on the drawing board.

Funding, on the other hand, is nonexistent.

By the way, selling tanks to Iraq could end up being like the F-14's we sold to Iran. Just sayin'.

5 posted on 03/08/2009 1:00:05 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl

I was just thinking what you were “just sayin”.


6 posted on 03/08/2009 1:06:56 PM PDT by mcshot (What the hell happened to our system of checks and balances and SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl
I'd be willing to bet that the guys who design this stuff have plenty of suitable replacements on the drawing board.

We do! Some would make even the most tech savvy moderen Buck Rogers jealous.
(I am one of the "guys who design this stuff")

7 posted on 03/08/2009 1:07:16 PM PDT by SLB (Wyoming's Alan Simpson on the Washington press - "all you get is controversy, crap and confusion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Are the tanks a freebie from Uncle Sugar or are the Iraqis paying for them?


8 posted on 03/08/2009 1:09:02 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Let me guess...these tanks will be given free of charge. A gift from the American people. We won’t even demand any of the oil we should have been taking as payment for the past 5 years +.


9 posted on 03/08/2009 1:11:57 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Don’t know.


10 posted on 03/08/2009 1:13:09 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
The Abrams series is the best tank in the world (actually, it ties the number one spot with the German Leopard 2, and the British Challenger 2 ...thus it is a 3-way tie for number one). Basically, there is really no tank out there that is LIKELY to face the Abrams (that is, used by a foe nation) that is better than it. Furthermore, add in the way-above-par training of the crews, and an American crewed Abrams is a lethal machine.

Obviously things can go wrong, and currently the constant war between missiles and armor (whereby you develop a great missile, then a few years later a new armor solution comes up that defeats that missile, leading you to come up with a missile that can defeat that armor, making the armor maker come up with an armor that is better than the missile, etc etc ad infinitum) is starting to give the missile an advantage. There are more and more top-attack dual-warhead ATGMs that can punch through the top-armor of a tank, and have a dual-warhead system to defeat reactive armor. The Kornet, for instance, was used to great effect against the Israelis (it managed to stop several Merkavas, which are very good tanks, but the reason i said 'great effect' is not because of that ....that was actually a little hyped up. The 'great effect' is due to the proganda war effect the missile gave to the Hezbollah Jihadis). There are some new prototypes being worked on that are quite ingenous (and dangerous), including a new one that actually fires a smaller missile ahead of the main missile (instead of simply having a dual warhead) so as to defeat hard kill anti-missile systems (tanks have started coming up with hard kill systems that fire small projectiles at incoming missiles, since that is better than risking a hit from the newer missiles. Now the newest prototypes are working on defeating hard kill systems, even though hard kill systems have still not yet been fully adopted in Western tanks).

Thus, missiles seem to be slowly taking a slight advantage.

However, while the Leo2 and Chally 2 may equal the Abrams, there is no better tank in this entire world. It is still a beautiful machine at what it does. It is just that going forward it will need to be employed with better support, and avoid urban battles where some jihadi may pop up with one of the new missiles from the school building to your left!

11 posted on 03/08/2009 1:13:23 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Don’t know.


12 posted on 03/08/2009 1:13:42 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SLB
"We do!"

That's great to hear.

Now, about that funding thing...

13 posted on 03/08/2009 1:16:40 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; ChicagahAl

One would hope they put a hidden “Low Jack” switch on them in the event Iran gets a chance to “take one for a ride”!


14 posted on 03/08/2009 1:21:19 PM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Forget any new armor. - Or new and better anything at all.

Hussein has vowed to drastically curtail military spending and I believe every bit of that.

He has also stated in public that we can't be setting our heaters so high, using as much energy, driving our big cars, or doing a lot of things that have come to define “success” in the modern world.

As we come to grips with massive debt, sky high prices for oil, food, and energy, and therefore become the modern liberal’s wet dream for us, our children, and our country , all of which makes us heavily, if not totally, dependent on government subsidies, who here thinks that we can maintain, develop and field a 1st World power armed force?

15 posted on 03/08/2009 1:29:44 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB

Have you ever heard of Dr. Phillip Lett? He is probably no longer with us but I am not sure. His Father who had a PHD from Yale was pastor of our little Southern Baptist church when I was a boy.


16 posted on 03/08/2009 1:34:02 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JDoutrider

I’d prefer something that would give anyone that jacked an Abrams to Iran a real charge - say 50KT in size.


17 posted on 03/08/2009 1:35:24 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

The M1A1 is being replaced by the M1A2 version in the US Army with M1A3 on the drawing board. A good thing just keeps on getting better.


18 posted on 03/08/2009 1:36:23 PM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrats are the party of EVIL whose time of judgment has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

What about the K2 Black Panther?


19 posted on 03/08/2009 2:29:29 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; indcons; Jeff Head; Army Air Corps; TigerLikesRooster
Problem with letting the Iraqis purchase M1A1 tanks is that there would be a strong likelihood that the ChiComs would get a hold of one through the Arab black market and reverse engineer it.

Check out the ChiCom version of the military-grade Humvee...


20 posted on 03/08/2009 4:21:16 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson