Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/07/2009 12:05:36 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

As I read more and more stories about these foreclosure “victims”, I become angrier and angrier that the responsible among us (as well as our children and grandchildren) will be forced to pay for these idiots’ greed, stupidity and excess.


2 posted on 03/07/2009 12:07:07 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

$66,000 in equity and second loans. They consumed their way into trouble.


4 posted on 03/07/2009 12:13:30 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Many of these bankrupts pulled out a ton of money from a rising asset. Their home was an ATM machine. And responsible people are supposed to help them stay in their homes? Not be foreclosed on?


5 posted on 03/07/2009 12:15:18 PM PST by dennisw (Archimedes--- Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum to place it, and I shall move the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar

Ping!

I think I know where this house might be. It looks very familiar.


6 posted on 03/07/2009 12:15:35 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (HOPE and CHANGE? More like BAIT and SWITCH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

I’m supposed to feel sorry for people who took out $66,000 in loans on a house that wasn’t paid for?


8 posted on 03/07/2009 12:24:07 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

“The Binfets had no trouble paying their mortgage for the first three years. As long as the housing market remained strong, so did the family’s income. “


What in the heck does a strong housing market have to do with a family’s income? As long as I have my job my income will remain strong also. My house has nothing to do with my income.

I don’t refinance my house to cash out and buy toys. What a bunch of idiots. I have sacrificed and tried to be wise and I will end up paying for these irresponsible slobs. They get the toys and I get the bill.

Thanks a lot.


9 posted on 03/07/2009 12:24:53 PM PST by GreyMountainReagan (Liberals do not view the book 1984 as a warning but as a guideline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
The Binfets had no trouble paying their mortgage for the first three years. As long as the housing market remained strong, so did the family’s income.

Market appreciation = income??? HELLO. McFly??? And they harvested their new-found paper equity.

11 posted on 03/07/2009 12:33:37 PM PST by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

50K for a deck and some landscaping? You’ve got to be kidding me. Even the guys on This Old House couldn’t run up the bill that high and believe me, they’re experts.


15 posted on 03/07/2009 12:35:37 PM PST by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
Your excerpt actually dampens the fury I have at the staff writers, Jeanne Lang Jones and Kirsten Grind. Read the first bolded and italicized part of their story and it was all the fault of the mysterious growing mortgage that took on a life of its own, and no one knew why.

So what if the servicing company changed hands several times over. That didn't change the payment although it would make the monthly mailing a bit confusing. Did they not get all those HUD forms at the closing? Was this a compound-vig loan or something?

If someone stops that far into the story, it is all the fault of the bank and the Binfet's were attacked by their mortgage. BUT .. read on and see how they refinanced and spent their way to ruin and it is clear that while the banks could be considered enablers, the Binfet's enjoyed the high life milking their cash cow home.

21 posted on 03/07/2009 12:46:32 PM PST by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Just damn!!


30 posted on 03/07/2009 1:49:57 PM PST by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99
"The new loan was a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage with a 7.25 percent interest rate and a monthly payment of $2,400 a month.

Unless I'm missing something here, this does not compute out as stated. It works out to $341.09 a month not $2,400.00.

32 posted on 03/07/2009 2:37:19 PM PST by Old Badger (After this sorry election, boy do opportunities abound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

I have always rented because I had not the income to feel comfortable enough to be responsible for purchasing a home. Now I feel like an idiot. Responsibility has nothing to do with it, I should have bought a home years ago and if I got into trouble expected the tax payers of this nation to bail me out!

Personal responsibility? What’s that?


33 posted on 03/07/2009 4:14:00 PM PST by Grunthor (All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chet 99

Yep all of those people who used their homesto finance their lifestyles are now having to pay the pieper. $50,000 for landscaping YIKES! A shovel and a few trips to Lowe’s over several years is a much cheaper!


35 posted on 03/07/2009 5:40:45 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson