“I think anyone who has even the vaguest notion that the Impeachment process can be engaged in this Congress is deluded and deranged.”
Likewise anyone who thinks AG Holder is going to initiate a Quo Warranto Action and appoint Orly as Special Prosecutor is also “deluded and deranged.”
“What all conservatives need to be doing is working on things that *can happen*. I’ve mentioned one that I thought *can happen* — and it is. That’s for the individual states to pass legislation to properly vet candidates in the elections.”
I also agree that this can happen and prevent BO from being President in 2013 and thereafter but it will do nothing to remedy our current problem of having bo as POTUS.
The only way to remedy said bo problem is to legally remove him from office ASAP!
The only Lawyer who is close to accomplishing that is Phil Berg. Do your Patriotic Duty and send Phil a donation:
You said — “The only way to remedy said bo problem is to legally remove him from office ASAP!”
Well, although I would agree with the sentiment of removing Obama from office, at the very same time, I don’t see any legal way to do it. And I’ve seen the threads here on Free Republic, talking about all the ways to do it. They don’t seem like they are working, for one thing, and secondly, they never have seemed to be valid “methodologies” for accomplishing this task.
I’ve posted to that effect that they don’t seem “real” and that they won’t work in “real life” and that’s the way I see it — which has nothing to do with me “wanting” Obama to stay in office. It’s just that I don’t see these methodologies mentioned here as viable in real life.
I do see other ways of accomplishing the removal of Obama from office that do have a chance of working in “real life” — but they can only work at the next election. I don’t see any way (in a real-life working sense) to remove him *right now* though.
—
And then you said — “The only Lawyer who is close to accomplishing that is Phil Berg. Do your Patriotic Duty and send Phil a donation: ...”
I know you like Berg and that’s fine. But, you’ll understand, I hope, that if I see another way that will work politically and legally, that I’ll be supporting that way. And also, that it would not be something that I do — in that I am not in the practice of supporting things that I had personally judged are not viable and will not work. If you heard of a person who did such a thing — in supporting things that they honestly thought would never work — you would wonder what is the matter with their “thinking”... :-)