Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SolidWood
And here's this gem:

"Minnery says he is not upset with Palin and says the fault lies with the Judicial Council for sending her no candidates that his group could really get behind."

So Minnery himself says Palin's hands were tied and that she had no choice. Let's just assume the worst and that both judges are liberals. Minnery for some unknown reason that he can't even state thinks one of them is slightly more conservative, but Palin obviously disagrees and picks the other. And that's a reason to savage Palin? This will be the end of Palin's career? I'm trying to think of something more stupid than that, but I'm stumped right now.
19 posted on 03/06/2009 2:00:51 PM PST by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky; EternalVigilance

Read #18 and #19!


20 posted on 03/06/2009 2:03:29 PM PST by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: GLDNGUN

Another non issue. What else is knew, people jumping to conclusions AGAIN without getting all the facts. What a shock...NOT

Also you guys should all watch this Charlie Rose interview that he did with Sarah..it’s AWESOME and goes in depth about “pleasing everyone”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZlWnCcBFpo&eurl=http://www.teamsarah.org/forum/topics/charlie-rose-green-room-w


22 posted on 03/06/2009 2:07:10 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson