Long piece, but it shows the complete INABILITY of the AGW extremists/environmentalists to even debate the facts - note the anger and hatred and extremism - The vicious reuse and reuse and reuse of their (anti-Soviet socialism!!) Nazi curses.
Compare with Hansen's recent "death trains" of coal, the entire "global warming denier" label - to match the Holocaust denier" and neo-nazi" labels, the use of Mengale (as a "scientist!") .....
To: xcamel; steelyourfaith; neverdem
reference: Notice how the “religion” of AGW and environmentalism requires “conversion” from their current view when presented by the facts and actual global trends in temperature, gas levels, and the earth’s responses.
Not conversation. They can’t “converse” about this topic. They can’t “reason” about it.
2 posted on
03/06/2009 9:48:14 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Wow, great post! Thanks for posting it!
4 posted on
03/06/2009 9:52:39 AM PST by
MeganC
(Palin-Limbaugh 2012)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
That’s the same old liberal M.O. If you can’t defend your position, personally attack the opposition.
6 posted on
03/06/2009 9:58:04 AM PST by
BubbaBasher
("Thus always to tyrants.")
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I have been amazed at the number of people who buy into the AGW garbage. Unbelievable.
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Viscount Monckton of Brenchley
Possible new tag line.
10 posted on
03/06/2009 10:04:15 AM PST by
pappyone
(New to Freep, still working a tag line.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Nice to see that reason is not entirely dead.
11 posted on
03/06/2009 10:06:28 AM PST by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
12 posted on
03/06/2009 10:07:05 AM PST by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Many years ago as a B team debate I remember going to listen to a debate team from Oxford debate a well respected team from the US.
I still remember the Oxford team-their wit, their attention to detail, and finally their love of the craft.
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Many years ago as a B team debater I remember going to listen to a debate team from Oxford debate a well respected team from the US.
I still remember the Oxford team-their wit, their attention to detail, and finally their love of the craft.
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
16 posted on
03/06/2009 10:34:12 AM PST by
Ditto
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Thanks for the fantastic post!
Another great item on the site is “Its the Sun, Stupid!”
Has it been posted?
I’m on lunch and lazy or I’d check...
17 posted on
03/06/2009 10:37:40 AM PST by
astyanax
(Status quo, you know, is Latin for 'the mess we're in.' Ronald Reagan)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Great post! The British really do excel in debating skills. The Opposition must have really destroyed the Proponents to win a vote of university students.
18 posted on
03/06/2009 10:44:13 AM PST by
colorado tanker
(Oh my God, am I hoping for change.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
P.S. No wonder Algore won't debate Monckton!
19 posted on
03/06/2009 10:45:14 AM PST by
colorado tanker
(Oh my God, am I hoping for change.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
He argued that AGW is a fact because the United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has published its Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) that says the IPCC is 90% certain that AGW exists. From this he claimed there is a crisis because governments are failing to give the matter sufficient importance. This in a tried and true technique which has enjoyed great success for almost 20 years.
I submit the following as proof:
Reminds me of a fascinating quote from a Chinese Com government during the "International Woman's Conference" held in China during the Clinton administration. The government official said ..."that they studied Hillary's speechmaking method to understand her power and success. They concluded: her trick was never actually to make any arguments -- just state conclusions that were all already accepted as self-evident by her audience.
(They found that interesting and perhaps admirable, and to be emulated).
22 posted on
03/06/2009 11:41:12 AM PST by
Publius6961
(Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
26 posted on
03/06/2009 8:35:17 PM PST by
Wil H
(No Accomplishments, No Experience, No Resume No Records, No References, Nobama..)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
27 posted on
03/06/2009 8:36:29 PM PST by
nufsed
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Thanks for the thread, it’s an enjoyable read.
28 posted on
03/06/2009 9:22:28 PM PST by
Balding_Eagle
(If Liberals would pay their taxes, there would be no deficit..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson