To: EternalVigilance
The best spin you can put on this is that the judicial council runs Alaska.
She could have put her foot down and not appointed anyone until they came back with an acceptable nominee. That would have been within her constitutional purview.
But I guess these things arent worth fighting for.
Once again, prove your point with links to relevant information.
Your posting a opinion as if it is fact without any supporting material.
So far all you look like is someone who either dislikes Sarah Palin, shilling for another candidate, or is afraid of Sarah.
Please provide some supporting information.
66 posted on
03/06/2009 9:57:28 AM PST by
SoConPubbie
(GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
To: SoConPubbie
The “supporting information” is the Alaska Constitution. You can Google it and read it as well as I can.
75 posted on
03/06/2009 10:01:09 AM PST by
EternalVigilance
( TR: "Walk softly and carry a big stick." BHO: "Mince softly and carry a spaghetti noodle.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson