[EternalVigilance]

It’s an unjust law, because it is unconstitutional. The Governor, and every officer of governement, have sworn an oath to defend innocent human life.

Laws passed by the Legislature which are unconstitutional are null and void, and we have three co-equal branches of governement to stand as a check and balance against unconstitutional breaches of the people’s rights. The Governor has an equal duty to follow that constitution, no matter the cost to themselves personally.

[kevkrom]

It’s an unjust law, because it is unconstitutional. The Governor, and every officer of governement, have sworn an oath to defend innocent human life.

You have become what you claim to hate. Your reasoning is more specious than the most whacked-out Stevens opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court.

You have decided that since there is an unproven allegation that a potential court nominee might not be pro-life, that the Governor has the authority to interpret the state constitution on her own to allow her to completely abrogate another part of that constitution.

Seriously, what drugs are you on?

[SoConPubbie]

It’s an unjust law, because it is unconstitutional. The Governor, and every officer of governement, have sworn an oath to defend innocent human life.

Now you are making sense.

Stick to this line of argument and lose the trashing of Sarah out and you and I can agree.