1 posted on
03/06/2009 7:10:50 AM PST by
Delacon
To: Delacon
"Why could this bite (or byte, as the case may be) Obama? Because he allowed and probably helped plan this all out attack on a mere talk radio guy by his White House staff and all the Old Media folks they control. Folks like George Stephenapolous, Paul Begala and James Carville have filled the airwaves with the talking points theyve been handed. On top of that even Obamas Chief of Staff and his Press Secretary have engaged the radio talker in verbal attacks." A professor from Columbia took time out to weigh in on Rush's debate challenge but failed to comment on the role of Begala-Carville-Stephanopoulos in vulgarizing public discourse? There's some kind of problem there.
To: Delacon
3 posted on
03/06/2009 7:16:21 AM PST by
Tex Pete
(Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions!)
To: Delacon
President Obama is quickly rushing himself into a no win scenario. It is fast coming to a point where Rush Limbaugh wins no matter what. And that right there is funny no matter who you are.
I know Rush is laughing his rearendo off because he’s thinking....What the hell? A sitting president of the United States is coming after me? Bring it on O’Bozo! It’s already a win-win for Rush. Obambi has a hell of a lot more things to be concerned about than his ego!
To: Delacon
To: Delacon
6 posted on
03/06/2009 7:21:21 AM PST by
papasmurf
(Impeach the illegal bastard!)
To: Delacon
Won’t happen and it shouldn’t. I also wouldn’t have wanted to see Bush debating Olbermann.
8 posted on
03/06/2009 7:25:14 AM PST by
gracesdad
To: Delacon
And that right there is funny no matter who you are.C'mon! Where is the credit to
Larry the Cable Guy?
11 posted on
03/06/2009 7:27:15 AM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Delacon
The Assistant Professor I mention above developed the theme that Rush is a clown that is beneath the attention of the President of the United States. He went on to claim that should Obama deign to debate Limbaugh the president would help Limbaugh gain in status simply by engaging the radio talker. To a certain degree Limbaugh himself agrees with the basic concept of his uplift by Obama.So explain to me why, based on the same premise, would Obama ever talk with Ahmadinejad or Hamas?
13 posted on
03/06/2009 7:27:34 AM PST by
Wil H
(No Accomplishments, No Experience, No Resume No Records, No References, Nobama..)
To: Delacon
14 posted on
03/06/2009 7:28:11 AM PST by
edzo4
(NoBama 2012)
To: Delacon
The author missed an important point... the White House has declared that they see Rush as the leader of the opposition party.
15 posted on
03/06/2009 7:28:36 AM PST by
SolidWood
(Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
To: Delacon
If nothing else, it shut Barry and his peeps up.
17 posted on
03/06/2009 7:31:04 AM PST by
Sig Sauer P220
(There ought to be one day -- just one -- when there is open season on Senators --- Will Rogers)
To: Delacon
24 posted on
03/06/2009 7:34:51 AM PST by
gibsosa
To: Delacon
I did not know that Obama had any credibility. If he cannot take his teleprompter there will be no debate.
28 posted on
03/06/2009 7:38:32 AM PST by
Piquaboy
To: Delacon
I agree with you. Barack and his surrogates are showing their immaturity in replying to Rush.
30 posted on
03/06/2009 7:40:22 AM PST by
Piquaboy
To: Delacon
Obama knows that he could never win a debate with Rush Limbaugh-—Rush would feed this socilist/liberal muslim to the sharks!!!—The Revolution is Coming!!!
33 posted on
03/06/2009 7:43:44 AM PST by
GOLDCLAW
To: Delacon
So, as you may have guessed, I ascribe to this theory. If I were president and an unhinged lefty radio twerp were challenging me to a debate, I would ignore the situation entirely. Nice try, but it's Obama and his minions that are trying to paint Rush as the face and leader of the republican party. Rush didn't make that claim, the democrats did. President Bush never identified some left wing radio twerp as the leader of the democrat party and started to build straw man arguments based upon that. This is entirely a creation of Obama, so it's a little late to suggest Obama should simply ignore it...he should have ignored it in the first place...it is Obama who is displaying hypocrisy.
35 posted on
03/06/2009 7:53:49 AM PST by
highlander_UW
(The only difference between the MSM and the DNC is the MSM sells ad space in their propaganda)
To: Delacon
Its also interesting to see the so-called unbiased media run with the White House meme that Rush is the ‘leader of the Republicans’ which is absurd. He is leader of the conservatives, which is vastly different.
37 posted on
03/06/2009 7:59:46 AM PST by
GeronL
(Will bankrupting America lead to socialism?)
To: Delacon
the final line is already here.
46 posted on
03/06/2009 2:56:03 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson