[Zakeet]

Rush has been driving the media Libtards crazy. For example, in only the last two days ...

Newsweek’s Alter on MSNBC: GOP ‘Party of Jell-O’ For Not Standing Up to Limbaugh

Rachel Maddow on Leno: Limbaugh Should Back Socialism Once It's Enacted

MSNBC: GOP ‘Sinking Fast’ Because of Rush Limbaugh

Former NYT Reporter Calls 'Clown' Limbaugh a 'Sweaty, Swollen Man'

David Shuster: GOP Members Who Don't Slam Rush 'Appear Unpatriotic'

Lib Talker: 'Maybe Limbaugh Should Be Executed For Treason'

Envious Ed Schultz Likens Limbaugh to Hitler

Matthews: Obama v. Limbaugh Like 'Walrus Wrestle,' 'Peeing' with 'Skunk,' 'Snoopy' & 'Red Baron'

Politico Exposes White House and Media's Anti-Limbaugh Strategy

MSNBC's David Shuster Badgers Ron Paul: 'Even You' Won't Slam Rush

'Today' Blames Limbaugh for GOP 'All-Time Low'

WaPo Animation: Line of Effeminate Republicans Kiss Limbaugh's Butt -- Literally

The guy is obviously striking a nerve by exposing the truth about the leftist agenda.

[massgopguy]

The boss’s wife asked me yesterday if I knew who the sponors of Rush’s show were because she wanted to complain about the controversial things he says. Whe I said that that’s the purpose of Talk Radio, she responded “that’s why I don’t listen to it”.

[Old Teufel Hunden]

It’s amusing to me how these liberal columnists see Rush and all they see is a fat guy. Yet, when these same columnists see Michael Moore they see a hero. The difference in appearance between these two is striking. Michael Moore is a rich man, yet he dresses as if he just came back from the welfare office. I’ve seen pictures of him with a tuxedo on, and still wearing that stupid crusty Michighan State hat. Geeze, you’d think with a tux he could at least get a new Michighan State hat!!

[Matchett-PI]

BREITBART: Rush to judgment: A media hopelessly divided
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/02/rush-to-judgment-a-media-hopelessly-divided/

[...]

“With newspapers long ago judged as far gone on the left and television networks turned off for good by enraged customers, the media has good reason to hate Mr. Limbaugh.

Mr. Limbaugh is the man who is most to blame for their demise. No wonder they bad-mouth him every chance they get.”

[...]

<>

More:

“When I say that the Obamanauts are about to enter a world of pain, I mean that they will eventually know the dark side of the wave of fantasy upon which they are riding. ..”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2193055/posts?page=19#19

[olezip]

Goodman probably knows she is lying, but wants to stick with her spittle specked rant, anyway. Limbaugh has said over and over that he does not accept the Obama claim that his policies will "rescue" the country and that it is these same policies that he wants to fail.

I no longer wonder why people like Ellen Goodman simply cannot face the facts and have a dispassionate discourse on the pros and cons of Limbaugh's position. Would it not be something if she were capable of identifying the substance of Limbaugh's remarks, and then presenting her compelling case?

I can only conclude that Mike Savage is correct in asserting that Liberals have disordered minds.

[synchron]

Years ago at about the same time that I had the misfortune to become aware of of Feminist/Propagandist Ellen, I came across a news article about one of her cohorts who wished to legally change her name from “Cooperman” to “Cooperperson”.
Since that time Ellen has and always will be, to me, Ms. Goodperson.

[stayathomemom]

Now a touch of reality here. Women don't tune in to talk radio as much as men.

Is this really accurate or is she just making a supposition?

Women have had quite enough men yell at them, thank you, and Rush is more than vaguely reminiscent of the boss from hell.

I thought I heard a study recently that most women would rather work for a man.

[camle]

ellen goodMAN is a perfect example of the Pudlo theorem of modern sociology - “The Intelligentsia isn't”

[GeronL]

and Rush is not the voice of Republicans, he is the voice of Conservatism, quite different

[Wil H]

You see, it's all about the "change." But, like her compatriots on the extreme left, she has no notion of what "change" even means. The word is but some panacea, some shadowy happy talk. Change what? None of them know. Like good little lemmings, they only know how to chant "Obama, change, Obama change" but have no clue what it means.

Read "Rules for Radicals".

In the first Chapter Alinsky explains the "Ideology of Change" as a left wing tactic.

Basically... First you have to get people angry and disaffected, you tell everyone how bad things are, and how they have been abused.

Then you demand that things "change" but you don't say how.

You let everyone define "change" in their own terms that are meaningful to each individual

You then rally them to the cause of "change" without ever promising anything.

That's "Community Organizing" in a nutshell.

Does this sound familiar? Do you remember the stupid woman who thought she was never going to have buy gas again or pay her mortgage? That's the perfect execution of the technique

[Lorianne]

Whether or not you agree with her, Ellen Goodman is very sloppy as a writer. I’ve been amazed and stunned at her bad grammar for years. Doesn’t she have an editor?

[CaptainAmiigaf]

For many, many years, I read the Boston Blob each and every day. While I disagreed with almost all of their viewpoints, it was, in the old tradition, a paper worth reading. As the Blob moved further and further left, I read it less and less.
Then one magic day a column written by Ellen Goodman became the very END.
Many columnists take pride in the new readers their columns attract, but Ellen, how do you like being the very reason that your paper loses one of the thousands of readers that have gone elsewhere SPECIFICALLY because of your nonsense?