Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

(I am from Indiana, however I am friends with our sponsor in the Senate), however I think the question you Oklahomans need to ask Sen. Brogdon, and Rep. Key is: WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP in Asserting State Sovereignty (Protection of the Constitutional Rights of citizens of your state): (I sincerely hope this wasn't a "feelgood" measure..)
1 posted on 03/05/2009 8:56:00 PM PST by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake

Ping!


2 posted on 03/05/2009 8:56:50 PM PST by JSDude1 (R(epublicans) In Name Only SUCK; D(emocrats) In Name Only are worth their weight..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

i realize that on the face of it these measures change nothing. What practical function do they serve, beyond political points for state legislatures with their constituents?


3 posted on 03/05/2009 8:58:28 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Can the Federal Government still mandate states to do certain things that cost the states money?


6 posted on 03/05/2009 9:13:04 PM PST by Hanna548 (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

B U M P


7 posted on 03/05/2009 9:18:09 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

There seems to be two camps here: 1) This does not mean anything and 2)this could be the start of something BIG.

Yes, the Dukes and Duchesses in Versailles on the Potomac will ignore these acts and continue their profligate ways.
Yes, the answer is do not take money in any form nor send taxes of any kind.
Yes, ignore their unfunded mandates.

This is civil/legal disobedience. THAT is the next step; followed bythe alternative is armed insurrection.
No, it is not treason to restore our liberties.
No, do not fear the behemoth we have allowed to grow.
No, I will not resign myself to being a slave.

I served my country, when it was still mine. I will fight to get it back.


19 posted on 03/06/2009 3:08:07 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Go, Oklahoma!

The rest of the nation is watching you. Don’t let us down!


21 posted on 03/06/2009 4:45:16 AM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

I checked the legislature’s website for status information. It confirms what this article says about it passed the senate.

http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/WebBillStatus/main.html

I think the house and senate versions have to be reconciled. Thanks for posting this!

I also note that the senate information page calls this a constitutional amendment for OK. Anyone have any thoughts on that?


26 posted on 03/06/2009 7:08:16 AM PST by daylilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
Oklahoma was instrumental in getting the Trans Texas Corridor (Mexico to Canada) stopped. The legislature said there was no way it was going to run through Oklahoma.

JBS bump!

27 posted on 03/06/2009 7:21:46 AM PST by scan59 (Markets regulate better than government can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
Oklahoma House passed HJR1003

That's House Joint Resolution, it's not a bill. It's only symbolic, good symbolism, but it has no effect.

28 posted on 03/06/2009 7:29:28 AM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

A link in post #10 for MRStep.com lists 30 states. Some of them in prior years. They have updates that several states have lost the vote.


30 posted on 03/06/2009 7:42:50 AM PST by daylilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

This is good but addresses only half (the easy half of the problem). None of the federal encroachments are theoretically mandatory. Don’t want highway funds? No problem, your DUI threshold can be 0.20% if you want. So the feds are taking money from the citizens of the states, then buying the citizens’ freedoms from the state legislatures with the people’s own money! So as the feds have designed the game, it’s “bend over for our unConstitutional power grabs or sit by and fund the less principled and more socialist states that will”. The rules of the game are fundamentally broken and have to be addressed at that level, and not just by declining the latest “dollars for liberty” scam.


40 posted on 03/06/2009 4:57:56 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

B U M P


45 posted on 03/13/2009 7:42:21 PM PDT by jokar (The Church age is the only time we will be able to Glorify God, http://www.gbible.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson