Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DBrow

That’s an...interesting...mix of weapons.

Armor plate? As in rifle plates for a Class III vest?

NVD?

I don’t see any problems with owning any of that.

But I do want to know why he’d have all that, and just that, in a vehicle, in a state where much of it is felony possession.

I’m going to withhold judgement on this one, till we get some more information.


91 posted on 03/06/2009 12:19:20 AM PST by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: jeffers

“But I do want to know why he’d have all that, and just that, in a vehicle, in a state where much of it is felony possession.”

He was just passing through Ma, so was probably legal.

I too will wait for more, but I’m leaning towards a clueless hoplophobe reporter asking pointed leading questions...but then there is the 100K bail...I dunno.


109 posted on 03/06/2009 8:12:51 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: jeffers
But I do want to know why he’d have all that, and just that, in a vehicle, in a state where much of it is felony possession. Becasue you have to a really long way around, to get from Connecticut to Maine without going through Massachusetts?

Although, Danbury being on the Western end of CT, I think I'd have gone west into New York, then cut accross VT and NH to get to Maine.

But being 18 he probably didn't even think about laws being different in other states. Still, assuming "all that" is legal in CT, then he's protected under the Firearm Owners Protection Act.

118 posted on 03/06/2009 10:07:23 AM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson