Posted on 03/04/2009 9:32:13 PM PST by Scott Martin
Earlier, Bill Dupray detailed a list of prominent Democrat leaders who may be influenced to vote against President Obama's budget plan:
So here is the list of Democrat Senators who may possibly be influenced with calls and emails.
Evan Byah (Indiana), Mary Landrieu (Louisiana), Mark Warner (Virginia), Bill Nelson (Florida), Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota), Mark Pryor (Arkansas), Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire), Robert P. Casey Jr. (Pennsylvania), and Blanche L. Lincoln (Arkansas), Claire McCaskill (Missouri), Mark Begich (Alaska), as well as Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.). Senator Jon Tester (Montana) is not officially in the group, but the article details his discomfort with this spending free-for-all.
Add another surprising name to the list: New York Times leftist columnist Maureen Dowd.
Dowd actually sided with Sen. John McCain and ripped Obama, saying "he did not ask Congress to sacrifice and make hard choices; he let it do a lot of frivolous redecorating in its budget." Funny, when McCain was talking about how he had a career of fighting wasteful spending during the campaign, and Obama was simply talking about how he would do the same, Dowd invariably sided with Obama. Now you wonder if she thinks she made the wrong choice...
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
History repeats itself. This is looking a lot like 1977. Carter was hated by his own party, which had a lock on the legislative branch.
Too little, too late!!! Thanks NYT & demoRAT senator (& demoRAT voters) for NOTHING!!!
Too little, too late!!! Thanks NYT & demoRAT senators (& demoRAT voters) for NOTHING!!!
Then she is simply ahead of the crowd.
There was study recently that suggested that adults and young children select leaders based on only their faces.
We elected a “pretty face” with Obama. Nothing more.
Goodness help our nation.
Now that their socialist scumbag is safely in office, this piss-mouse Dowd and the rest of her ilk can pretend to be critical of Dumbo in order to try to fool their meager reading audiences into believing they are objective observers - - genuine journalists, if you will - - and really do have at least a little credibility.
And their readers may just be stupid enough to buy it.
Surely you jest!
I agree that this is her most likely motivation. At the same time, it’s good to see that many people who we assume are totally on board with where we know Obama is going, really aren’t that comfortable with it.
She quotes Shakespeare's King Lear:
This is the excellent foppery of the world, that, when we are sick in fortune often the surfeits of our own behavior we make guilty of our own disasters, the sun, the moon, and the stars.
...now how many of her readers will even understand the quote, much less the implication?
Hmm. I guess I wasn’t clear.
Dowd is perfectly “comfortable with it”. She’s phony, and her column is a self-serving lie. The election is over, so now she can pretend she’s a real journalist. It’s all a lie. Lying is what these mice DO.
I beg to differ. When he smiles, he reminds me of the "Mouth of Sauron" from the Lord of The Rings....
I’m telling you, this man is the first for America... It has nothing to do with his skin color!!!...Fear him. Gain back your survivalist nature that your elders taught you.
Oh,please.
They all have new knee-pads that are not even broken-in yet.
Give them all a year and see what they do.
That’s a tad bit extreme...But, I’ll give you this...he resemble the cat that just swallowed the family canary when he’s happy.
Amy is my Senator, I'll call her, but she's from the hard left moon-bat liberal side of the Democrat Party. I can't believe anyone really thinks she'll show any sense here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.