Replies

Oh, would you just stop. You're just being ridiculous. The title of this thread is "150 Years Later, Fossils Still Don't Help Darwin." Fossils.. Darwin... Nothing about string theory or any of that stuff. If and when there are threads here about that, I assure you I won't be posting on them. (Just as I don't post in the religion forum.)

If you insist that my personal lack of knowledge of theoretical physics somehow "destroys" evolution, then so be it. It's completely absurd, but what else can I say? I'm sorry if that's not satisfactory to you.

As for your repeated and quite frankly stupid contention that biology/evolution is somehow a liberal institution (and therefore, myself as well), that's your problem. I hope your doctors and IT department and plumber all pass your creationism litmus test.

In my world, tpanther, real science (not the populist crap that often makes news) does not subscribe to a political camp. (I'm NOT saying that the reportage on such things isn't often biased in the press; sorta like the opposite of AiG and ICR) Your wild paranoia disallows you to agree which again, I don't care about.

Ummmm...I’ll be glad to stop when you clowns will finally stop with the endles measurable, testable nonsense.

Because a tactic you regularly employ is exposed, this hypocrisy you go on with day in and day out, often unchallenged, means I’M being ridiculous?

LOL!

Being a nurse that works closely with doctors, I can assure you the last thing on our minds in our daily routine is darweenism.

Same for IT, plumbers and virtually everyone else.

But you go on believing it’s important and indespensable, just leave the normal folks alone will ya?

As for your repeated and quite frankly stupid contention that biology/evolution is somehow a liberal institution (and therefore, myself as well), that's your problem. I hope your doctors and IT department and plumber all pass your creationism litmus test.

But evos and atheists demand that doctors and IT departments and plumbers all pass the evo test to the extent of having it taught in public schools and testing them on it.

FWIW, one can take HS biology, pass everything with a 100, get every bit of the evo part wrong, and still pass with an overall average in the upper 90's and graduate high school.