Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

150 Years Later, Fossils Still Don't Help Darwin
ICR ^ | March 4, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 03/04/2009 7:16:11 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-472 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2009 7:16:11 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Finny; vladimir998; Coyoteman; allmendream; LeGrande; GunRunner; cacoethes_resipisco; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 03/04/2009 7:16:51 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Evolution and Christianity are perfectly compatible.


3 posted on 03/04/2009 7:19:31 PM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Although some creationists do say that “there are no transitional fossils,” it would be more accurate to state that there are no undisputed transitional forms. Although the article asserts that the fossil record “is full of them,” the reality is that it does not contain a single universally accepted transitional form.

And by disputing and refusing to accept the transitional forms, the cretionists provide their own evidence to support the assertion.

4 posted on 03/04/2009 7:21:44 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Transitional forms or not, the case can be made that, wherever matter is organized in some form so as to perform a specific function, intelligent design may be reasonably posited as a factor. One may also reasonably posit that all of the same is merely an illusion; that organized matter is a product of unguided happenstance.

Which of these two points of view should enjoy federal subsidies?


5 posted on 03/04/2009 7:27:41 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.

Really, please explain


6 posted on 03/04/2009 7:28:07 PM PST by 11th Commandment (United States is a NOW a Terrorist Nation- we export abortion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

The acceptance of every transitional fossil requires finding two more.


7 posted on 03/04/2009 7:28:23 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.

Only if one doesn’t believe that the Bible tells the real truth.


8 posted on 03/04/2009 7:28:30 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
The “classic fossil of Archaeopteryx” is not a transitional form either, but was fully bird. Its “reptile-like” teeth and wing claws are found in some birds today.8 Many reptiles have no teeth, but nobody claims that they evolved from birds.

Wow. And you accept this as fact?

9 posted on 03/04/2009 7:28:55 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
"Evolution and Christianity are perfectly compatible."

NO, they are not.

10 posted on 03/04/2009 7:29:12 PM PST by Longhair_and_Leather (The new presidential mantra--"Obama let babies die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment

What part of the statement requires explanation?


11 posted on 03/04/2009 7:29:37 PM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Sure. The bible is allegorical. God gave us brains to figure out how he got us here. He’d be disappointed if we didn’t try.


12 posted on 03/04/2009 7:31:06 PM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Longhair_and_Leather

Yep—afraid so.


13 posted on 03/04/2009 7:31:44 PM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Good. I’ve been looking for this type of article.


14 posted on 03/04/2009 7:32:07 PM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

The bible is allegorical. That doesn’t mean that it’s not “true”.


15 posted on 03/04/2009 7:32:40 PM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
Evolution and Christianity are perfectly compatible.

That's not undisputed, ergo it must be false.







Now consider: "The Bible is True"

16 posted on 03/04/2009 7:36:15 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ( As for a future life, every man must judge for himself between conflicting vague probabilities. - D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

There does not need to be a demonstrated slow transition from one species to the next. Evolutionary models work with the data available when both minor changes and major mutations occur randomly.


17 posted on 03/04/2009 7:37:32 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Am I correct in assuming that your post oozes sarcasm?


18 posted on 03/04/2009 7:38:01 PM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
Sure. The bible is allegorical. God gave us brains to figure out how he got us here. He’d be disappointed if we didn’t try.

Allegory is bad. It leads to "thinking"

19 posted on 03/04/2009 7:39:02 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ( As for a future life, every man must judge for himself between conflicting vague probabilities. - D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Of course! To an evolution fanatic any transition fossil never fills a gap between species.

Oh no, that just wouldn't do, would it?

Dear me, dear me.

*snaps fingers*

I know! I know! let's just call the transition fossil, a whole new species! Then we can whinge on endlessly about the two new gaps on either side!

Just in case they don't know it, we are aching aware of that little intellectually dishonest game. It manages to both be disgusting and boring.

20 posted on 03/04/2009 7:39:44 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 42 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-472 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson