Skip to comments.
NRA forces Pelosi retreat
The Hill ^
| 03/03/09
| Mike Soraghan
Posted on 03/04/2009 6:40:30 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
1
posted on
03/04/2009 6:40:30 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
DC is not one of the “several states” - what part of this do they not get???
2
posted on
03/04/2009 6:42:15 PM PST
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: neverdem
Oh. Politically? Darn it.
3
posted on
03/04/2009 6:42:59 PM PST
by
exist
To: neverdem
Glad I just sent in my membership renewal.
JoMa
4
posted on
03/04/2009 6:44:04 PM PST
by
joma89
To: xcamel
They don’t, doesn’t fit their needs.
5
posted on
03/04/2009 6:44:30 PM PST
by
txnativegop
(God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
To: neverdem
The Rats (Pelosi in particular) are scared to death of getting their butts kicked in the '10 midterms. ....a repeat of '94. She will say/do anything to hang onto power.
6
posted on
03/04/2009 6:46:59 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: joma89
Me too. The NRA better fight like lions against the marxists. The gun and ammo companies are the only American companies raking in money now.
7
posted on
03/04/2009 6:47:13 PM PST
by
Frantzie
(Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
To: neverdem
The D.C. vote bill needs to pass, said Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.), a Blue Dog gun-rights supporter who sits on the House Rules Committee. I would have concerns about any group who would tell us how to run our House.That's the problem in a nutshell right there. That idiot has forgotten that it's the people's house, not theirs! They're supposed to be representatives of the people, not their rulers! The S.O.3. should be run out of town!
To: neverdem
He added that since Congress has given D.C. home rule, it should not be dictating its gun laws.
Thats for them to do, Hoyer said of D.C. officials. On principle, this is not appropriate.
But it's OK to ignore that inconvenient Constitution thingy, that doesn't allow DC this kind of representation, isn't it, Hoyer?
So if they pass this bill for quasi-statehood for DC - including the gun law that the NRA supports - and subsequently the statehood bill is found to be unconstitutional and repealed, does the more relaxed gun law in DC get repealed at the same time?
To: neverdem
Well played Conservatives and Gun Rights Activists!..
10
posted on
03/04/2009 6:50:48 PM PST
by
JSDude1
(R(epublicans) In Name Only SUCK; D(emocrats) In Name Only are worth their weight..)
To: xcamel
If they can legislate the second amendment away, why not Artical 1, Sections 2 and 3?
After all, whose government do THEY think it is any way.
11
posted on
03/04/2009 6:50:50 PM PST
by
InABunkerUnderSF
(Be There >>> http://www.secondamendmentmarch.com)
To: xcamel
DC is not one of the several states - what part of this do they not get???Since when do Liberals give a damn about the Constitution? Sometimes they use it as a tool, but generally they would just as likely implement their agenda without it.
As for this bill, it's fun to see the Democrats stuck between a rock and a hard place. If it includes the Ensign Amendment, Liberals won't vote for it. If it doesn't include it, Blue Dogs won't vote it. In either case, the bill wouldn't get a majority and so would fail.
Apparently, DC wants to give Eleanor Holmes Norton a promotion, even if it means blatantly violating the Constitution, but not at the cost of obeying the Second Amendment. DC says it wants to be treated as a State, but, unlike any State, it wants to be exempt from having to obey it.
12
posted on
03/04/2009 6:53:00 PM PST
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: neverdem
This whole bill is a dodge. Its unconstiutional on many levels. The dems are playin us.
13
posted on
03/04/2009 6:53:09 PM PST
by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
To: exist
Nice imagery comes to mind with the headline, no?
To: neverdem
Members are reacting in knee-jerk fashion to the NRA, Norton said. This is Democratic members doing something to kill a basic civil rights bill.Here's a hint, Mizz Norton: firearms ownership is a "basic civil right."
15
posted on
03/04/2009 6:55:54 PM PST
by
Snickersnee
(Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
To: willgolfforfood
So if they pass this bill for quasi-statehood for DC - including the gun law that the NRA supports - and subsequently the statehood bill is found to be unconstitutional and repealed, does the more relaxed gun law in DC get repealed at the same time?No. The Ensign Amendment contains an exemption from the bill's nonseverability clause.
16
posted on
03/04/2009 6:56:00 PM PST
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: neverdem
17
posted on
03/04/2009 6:56:11 PM PST
by
Jet Jaguar
(Atlas Shrugged Mode: ON)
To: neverdem
The Framers did not want the capitol to have the direct ability to influence congress. DC is traditionally democratic, I can’t understand why. Democrats are irked that they aren’t getting their collective way; again.
18
posted on
03/04/2009 6:56:37 PM PST
by
ronnyquest
("That's what governments are for, to get in a man's way." -- Malcolm Reynolds)
To: neverdem
This is one of those times where the NRA has come out ahead by supporting democrat gun rights supporters.
Thanks NRA.
19
posted on
03/04/2009 6:57:03 PM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(NRA - TSRA- IDPA)
To: AbeLincoln
Honest, Abe, that was a slam-dunk.
What you just so eloquently stated is exactly what I have been telling, telephoning, writing, and emailing my elected officials for years: “You are not paid to lead me; you are paid to represent me.” These clowns need to be reminded every payday that they are temp workers and we are the Company they work for.
20
posted on
03/04/2009 6:58:01 PM PST
by
shoutingandpointing
(Our enemy is at the center of our donut munching its way outward to the big empty that lies beyond.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson