Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: houeto

These “minority” contracts really do need to be terminated. My experience is only in the transportation industry. Very often - in fact most of the time - the contracts will be given to a minority owned “business” that promptly farms them out as a sub to some non-minority owned business who was barred from bidding on the contracts. The minority owned “business” takes a healthy cut off the top, of course, while doing zero work. It is quite a lucrative scam.


45 posted on 03/04/2009 4:50:23 PM PST by piytar (Obama = Mugabe wannabe. Wake up America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: piytar

Forgot to mention that the non-minority owned businesses who get the sub-contracts have no problem with this because the minority owned ones charge such a premium on the contracts (due to limited competition) that there is plenty of premium to spread around...


47 posted on 03/04/2009 5:02:47 PM PST by piytar (Obama = Mugabe wannabe. Wake up America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: piytar

Federal contracts require that the minority firm do the majority of the work. Getting “8(a)” status is an involved process. And most sham outfits won’t pass muster. SBA guarnettees the performance of the 8(a) firm and has to pay back the Federal agency for the 8(a) contract cost if it turns out real bad. Emphasis on “real bad”.


50 posted on 03/04/2009 6:30:32 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (New Obama Mantra, "Screw World Peace, I'll Buy You A Pony.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson