Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Proposes In-State Gas Pipeline
Rig Zone ^ | March 04, 200 | Phaedra Friend

Posted on 03/04/2009 10:00:24 AM PST by thackney

In a press conference in Juneau on March 3, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin revealed a plan to encourage the construction of a $4 billion in-state natural gas pipeline.

"We've got to do this project," Palin said. "We've got to see it come to fruition, or our state will be a state that imports natural gas despite the fact that Alaska is sitting on some of the world's richest reserves of gas."

On Feb. 27, 2009, the Alaskan governor submitted two pieces of legislation to the House and Senate rules committees concerning the in-state gas pipeline. The March 3 press conference offered more information about the legislation and the proposed pipeline.

"Alaskans have been excited about the progress made toward our big gas line, which will secure our fiscal future as we take this abundant resource to Lower 48 markets," Governor Palin said in a statement. "But we know that we cannot wait for that project to come to fuition before addressing our own heating and power-generating needs. My administration is committed to getting the ball rolling now on a pipeline strictly for Alaskans."

Reuters reports that the in-state pipeline would traverse some 800 miles from the North Slope to the population centers along southern Alaska's Cook Inlet. With a diameter of 24 inches, the pipeline would have a capacity for 500 MMcf/d, beginning in 2015.

The in-state pipeline project would precede the massive endeavor to build an Alaskan pipeline from the North Slope to North America, which is expected to be operational by 2018.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: energy; naturalgas; pipeline

I look at this as signs of expected delay's on the big gasline to the south. The plans for the big project include taps that would have served this demand.

1 posted on 03/04/2009 10:00:24 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Why can’t we have leaders like this in Washington ?


2 posted on 03/04/2009 10:02:38 AM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Jesus Christ is the answer. He loves you more than you could ever imagine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If I had the money and youth to do so, I’d pack up the family and head to Sarah country !


3 posted on 03/04/2009 10:05:47 AM PST by tomkat (lexington, concord, flyover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Is this big enough to generate all their electricity? What are the using now, coal?


4 posted on 03/04/2009 10:10:24 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Western Phil

All their electricity generation is not in this one area, even though the majority is in South Central.

3.1% Coal
10.4% Petroleum
59.0% Natural Gas
18.3% Hydro

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/st_profiles/sept05ak.xls


5 posted on 03/04/2009 10:16:43 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Western Phil

Depending on location, power is generated from any number of sources. In Valdez, they use hydro-electric. In Fairbanks they use coal, due to Fairbanks’ proximity to the coal mines at Healy. Wasilla buys its power from Anchorage, and Im not sure what method they use, most likely natural gas.


6 posted on 03/04/2009 10:17:42 AM PST by intenseracer (Welcome to the Obamanation!!! now where my money at?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: intenseracer

If they really wanted to clean up, they’d start building natural gas, nuclear and hydro power plants, then export the electricity to the lower 48 states. It has to be cheaper to build a 1,000,000 DC transmission line than to build a natural gas pipeline for the same distance. Better yet, build both at the same time.

Oh, and put a 50% environmentalist-whacko surcharge on power sold to California, Oregon and Washington, but let Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Wyoming, etc. has the power at cost plus 10%. The more money the libs have to spend on electricity, the less they can donate to Moveon, Sierra Club, etc...


7 posted on 03/04/2009 10:46:19 AM PST by CarmichaelPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TPluth

” It has to be cheaper to build a 1,000,000 DC transmission line than to build a natural gas pipeline for the same distance.”

Wonder if anyone has done the math? There is a DC line from the Columbia (John Day?) to the LA area that has been in place for quite a while. It must work OK.


8 posted on 03/04/2009 11:18:22 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TPluth
It has to be cheaper to build a 1,000,000 DC transmission line than to build a natural gas pipeline for the same distance.

That is not a clear winner in price. Building, Operating and Maintaining a power plant North of the Arctic Circle is also far more expensive than in the lower 48. Electrical line losses may be as large as the compressor consumptions. HVDC does help but not eliminate losses.

Also Natural Gas has more uses than just electrical power.

A pressure cut and meter station from 2,500 psi is far cheaper than Substation and Inverter station from 1 million Volt DC. Far easier to distribute along the way and at the end.

9 posted on 03/04/2009 12:28:58 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

Thats the billion dollar question, America decided to vote for a false messiah full of empty promises that has the agenda to destroy America, it was too easy to fall for the conniving candyman than follow a real American leader obviously.

Now everybody is crying and making plans to move to Alaska, maybe they should because I seriously doubt Sarah will ever leave it, they lost their chance and blew it, America does not deserve Sarah Palin in the Whitehouse anymore, she is an Alaskan.


10 posted on 03/04/2009 1:08:42 PM PST by Eye of Unk (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! SA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

I love that woman. She is what America should be. She is a patriot.


11 posted on 03/04/2009 1:48:16 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Jesus Christ is the answer. He loves you more than you could ever imagine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

here is another way to think of it.

I believe this country is falling apart. but people like you, me and Sarah will be here to put it back together.


12 posted on 03/04/2009 2:38:08 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Jesus Christ is the answer. He loves you more than you could ever imagine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Sigh

saraH got all goo-goo about this line AFTER the large (and foreign owned) ENSTAR gas company started looking in to the possibility of this so-called bullet line.

It may actually have a better chance of being built. FWIW, all the electricity used by Los Anchorage could be provided by hydo-power with a 5 year build period. BUt I doubt that will ever happen....

13 posted on 03/04/2009 7:38:46 PM PST by ASOC (This space could be employed, if I could only get a bailout...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson