Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cothrige
What is it to be socially liberal? Have you really ever thought about that? Some years ago it was illegal for a man to commit sodomy. In most cases it is not now. Is that change "socially liberal?" Does the conservative want to send such people to jail? I am a Christian, and I think it is sinful for people to reject Christ. Should I fight for a government that would make everyone be Christian? If I don't am I "socially liberal?"

Politicized social conservatives are to morality what politicized socialist liberals are to economics. In both cases, they can't be bothered to get off their butts and do the required work. (In the former case, the required work is leadership and conversion via persuasion and example; in the latter case, the required work is earning the desired standard of living via voluntary transactions.) Instead, they want the guvmint to do it for them. It doesn't work.

54 posted on 03/04/2009 10:49:57 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b

So clearly we don’t need murder laws, right? Because good example and persuasion will certainly win out, right?


56 posted on 03/04/2009 10:56:12 AM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b
Instead, they want the guvmint to do it for them. It doesn't work.

Yes, I believe this has become the standard position of both left and right. It is unfortunate. Look at the "conservatives" on this site that would blame libertarians for the failures of statism. Isn't that ironic? That is how far the entrenched statism has inveigled the conservative movement. Government, though, is not the solution. Right now that government forces "tolerance" onto everyone, and that filters into our children and ends with the implication that the aberrant are actually the norm. This leads to rampant social liberalism, which so many reject. However, we don't need to use that government to start forcing people to agree with us. If only we return people's freedoms to them then they will not have to endure this phony tolerance, and once again the values of the people will be asserted and the aberrant will again be treated as aberrant. Aberrance won't go away of course, as it never will, but it won't exert the influence it has for so long on our society. That is what we should seek, not government control. People need to stop blaming libertarians for their own statist failures and open their eyes to what big government has been getting them.

57 posted on 03/04/2009 11:29:23 AM PST by cothrige (Ego vero Evangelio non crederem, ni si me catholicae Ecclesiae commoveret auctoritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b
Instead, they want the guvmint to do it for them.

And they want the government to be the arbiter and enforcer of moral rectitude. How bizarre is THAT?

What we have currently is the result of allowing government where is does not belong. They don't sem to understand that. They seem to think that the current trend of government fostering (heck, subsidizng) irresponsibility and immorality is some accident of history rather than the predictable result of the collectivization of conscience.

101 posted on 03/06/2009 9:03:20 AM PST by Trailerpark Badass (Happiness is a choice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b
Instead, they want the guvmint to do it for them. It doesn't work.

Actually, steve "B", we just don't want the government to discourage it, as it does today. People who make statements like you just made must be ignorant of the fact that it "worked" quite well up until about the 60's and 70's when a bunch of social liberals decided those mores were passe and had social liberalism enshrined into law through the courts. Single mothers, abortion as birth control, and revolving door marriages are not good for a stable society. The social culture of Bill Ayers doesn't work except in a classroom.

161 posted on 03/07/2009 7:33:48 PM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson